Channel 1 is inverted with respect to Channel 2 so the PI setup restores the phase.Wouldn't that PI setup make the two channels out of phase at the output? If both channels were jumpered, you'd get comb filtering between them.
Channel 1 is inverted with respect to Channel 2 so the PI setup restores the phase.Wouldn't that PI setup make the two channels out of phase at the output? If both channels were jumpered, you'd get comb filtering between them.
Master volumes are not gain stages. They control the power tube section volume and are used to reduce overall amp volume when preamp tubes are driven to natural distortion.I'm simplifying a bit but master volumes on tube amps are a gain stage. They control the gain of the power amp tubes specifically. There are higher and lower headroom tubes and circuits can be designed for maximum headroom, but volume in a tube amp is never 100% transparent.
The other thing too is that it's very easy to run the modeled volume knob higher in a modeler than you would ever run it on a real amp because the real amp would be so painfully loud that's unusable.
When I first got into modelers, I tried to dial some basic fender clean tones. Most of the classic Fender amps are non-master volume but I just followed the conventional wisdom that Fenders are always clean and that "cranked = more good". In the Helix and Fractal, they would always be way more distorted than I wanted with the volume just on 5. I thought there was something wrong with the modeling but then I thought back to the times I've used real Fender amps and on most of them, I couldn't turn the volume past 3 before it got painfully loud and unusable. Between 2-3 was usually the sweet spot for me in terms of a clean tone.I discovered that the Fractal Amp models worked the same, which is to say they were accurate.
Channel 1 is inverted with respect to Channel 2 so the PI setup restores the phase.
York Audio has a ESD212 matchless IR pack that captures both of the dis-similar speakers. It sounds delicious with these models!One additional note on the Matchless DC sound as well is the fact that it comes with a set of mismatched speakers on purpose. (Not the HC or SC obviously). It’s a Greenback paired with a G12H30 from the factory. I would think you would want to run two different cabs panned stereo to get that same effect in the Fractal model.
From the Wiki:I’ve been working on a Matchless preset using both models. On the EF-86, it is pretty dark to me. The DC-30 is a little brighter. I’m liking it so far. Does anyone know what FAS did with the EF-86 in regards to the tone cap selector switch on the real amp?
EL-84 amps are not known for being clean. They are typically biased as "Class-A" using cathode biasing and no feedback. The power amp transfer function is therefore very nonlinear resulting in distortion even at low input levels.
You can clean up the power amp by increasing the Negative Feedback.
If you want to hear what a DC-30 can do listen to "Dulcinea" by Toad the Wet Sprocket. Some of the best EOB guitar tones in history.
Yes.EDGE of breakup?
^THIS^The other thing too is that it's very easy to run the modeled volume knob higher in a modeler than you would ever run it on a real amp because the real amp would be so painfully loud that's unusable.
Do you know details on what they used in the studio for that record? Just the DC-30 cranked? Or did they use drive pedals with it? I’d love to hear more insight on that just to learn and associate certain sounds with certain rigs I’m not familiar with!If you want to hear what a DC-30 can do listen to "Dulcinea" by Toad the Wet Sprocket. Some of the best EOB guitar tones in history.