I just wanted to start a discussion regarding the nomenclature and also say that we can just abbreviate.
See, you get it!
Apparently
it doesn’t tell you anything other than what person thinks of their studio. A lot of pro studios have full kitchens and sleeping accommodations as well.
Indeed!Hans Zimmer's studio is probably one of the most elaborate studios in the world, but it would be considered a "home studio" by the traditional definition. The idea that a home studio can't be a pro studio, or that a pro studio can't be a home studio has become an anachronism. The two are no longer mutually exclusive.
I get it but why do you even need to make that distinction, are you worried someone will think you’re a pro engineer? .Well to each his own-I always have and always will refer to my home studio as a , well, home studio.
1. It is IN MY HOME, so I am 50% there!
2. I record music there. I play music there. I write music there.
The whole idea, imho, of calling it a home studio is basically saying, No I do NOT make $$$ doing this and I only record myself.
If I made a living or even some money doing this I would call it recording Studio in my home.
Well they all can’t be zingers…* Sigh *
Call it whatever you feel is appropriate. I don’t think a recoding needs to have a prefix of home studio, it seems superfluous.It seems I missed the train on this cataloguing, naming & all.
Anyways, what's the consensus on "studio" and the penalties for misuse? (context: I'm in Canada - Bill C-63 is real )