Orvillain
Power User
Yeah but that is only coz there are a few hundred big eared oiks getting in the way of the bloody picture. The thing is tiny, and always crowded!!!
Yeah but that is only coz there are a few hundred big eared oiks getting in the way of the bloody picture. The thing is tiny, and always crowded!!!
70's prog rock blasphemy! Try listening to La Villa Strangiato (chapter VII Danforth and Pape).
which La Villa's got.
The level on the right-hand side next to Balance. That didn't help, nor did dropping the gain. Input trim helped a bit. Still clips/breaks up with a single coil vintage Strat.
Apologies, but I'm a hobby guitar player and I haven't ever recorded anything beyond a phone clip, I am not certain that would help effectively demonstrate the problem.
I posted the *.syx and linked to the preset in my original inquiry. Is there something I'm missing?
Yes, beyond the level jump, the amp is now clipping or breaking up. The clean channel was designed specifically not to break up on the real amp.
There are! But whether or not something is "good" or "bad" isn't a universal truth. You even make my point here (emphasis added).
And I'd agree with you, personally. But somebody else might say it was good (and they'd probably like jazz
). There's no way to objectively state which one of us is correct, without bringing personal opinion/taste into the discussion.
Yet you're happy to use a Fractal product to make your guitar playing sound better?
It seems as though your argument though is that there is no such thing as objective. Everything is subjective. I'm sorry but I vehemently disagree... Universal truths are reality as well as perceptive truths. If there is a Chord progression in a song of C, G, Am, F# no one will find that pleasing to the ear. The sonic dissonance is too much to get past. I mean the keys share exactly one note, a B. Anyway, that is enough derailing for me.There are! But whether or not something is "good" or "bad" isn't a universal truth. You even make my point here (emphasis added).
And I'd agree with you, personally. But somebody else might say it was good (and they'd probably like jazz
You can objectively say "that's out of key", but you can't objectively say "that's bad". Because that's a value judgement, which is by definition subjective.
Well sure! Because if I'm playing electric I'm going to need to amplify the sound with something. I don't use it to cover up poor playing or lack of talent. If I suck I'll either improve or quit. I won't try to make $$$ by sucking. I'm too much of a perfectionist for that. Too many artists today get careers because they look a certain way. They lack the real raw talent required and it is covered up by processing, autotune.
You're still talking about personal tastes and opinions though, which obviously can't be objective. And I don't really disagree with all that.And many people enjoy it, even having experienced the Mona Lisa. And also, many people may have experienced the Mona Lisa and not enjoy it.
It's still subjective. It's still opinion. Whether a piece of art is good or bad can't be anything but subjective opinion. There have been plenty of paintings since the Mona Lisa that could be classified as "better" depending on what specific angle one is talking about: accuracy, color representation, quality of materials, etc. Plenty that could be considered worse.
But art is always going to be subjective. There is no such thing as objective or empirically "good" or "bad" art. A child's drawing could be considered higher quality than any of the great works of the masters, and nobody would be wrong for holding that opinion, even if it's in the minority and deeply unpopular. It's a very intimate and personal experience, and if you like a thing, nobody can tell you you're right or wrong, only you can decide that for yourself. There is literally no such thing as an "objective quality" difference, because "quality" is, by definition, qualitative, and dependent on the observer and their tastes and values and viewpoints/experience.
As they say, it's in the eye of the beholder.
(Objective vs subjective is one of those hills I tend to die on, it's all intended to be good natured debate)
Though in this case it is a very simple fix to change the tone stack back to the “wrong” one. Speaking of which, it can be a lot of fun to do that and come up with your own unique Frankenstein Amp Setups.
Can confirm that JP2C Green clipping even when turned down.
Joking apart, let's just agree to disagree
As I said, I like dying on this particular hill so thanks for the debate (even though you're wrong, damnit! haha)
Sounds very exciting! Just out of curiosity, does this have to do with more correct values over existing parameters or is it an entirely different algorithm? In other words, for fm9 and fm3 can we just copy the new af3 default values or do we have to wait for a new fw?
Rossipedia did not state that there is no such thing as objective, but that your specific example of something objective was indeed subjective. This does not exclude objectivity in its entirety.
Yep, I think even Rick Beato talked about that first study in a video.
....ok, no I'm not, but I just can't believe how badass and dead on this is, it's got the feel...the fingers....the tone....it's ALL there, it's amazing!! I quickly paired it up with Leon's LT TV Mix 7 and a stock 80's Chorus and its instantly 1988 again!!
Because there was less hobby’s. No internet, not all these immediate things. So when you wanted to learn an instrument, you was working hard and you spent a lot of time on it.
