Norminski
Member
My presets were between 70 and 75% before the update. Now at 80-85%.
While I play and switch between presets, strange double tones come up
My presets were between 70 and 75% before the update. Now at 80-85%.
Post two example presets that exhibit the problem otherwise we're just guessing at the problem.
No other reports so I'd have to assume your RJM has developed an issue.
Check your Global and System settings. They may have been altered/reset from the firmware update. Or just reload them from the backup that you made before updating.
Make a recording. I don't know what "it" is.
You said "it still does it". Does what? Make a recording of the issue you are experiencing.
Is your volume pedal connected to the Mastermind, or directly to the AxeFx? (Assuming this is an expression pedal and not a true volume pedal.)
It’s connected to the Mastermind. I am using 2 EBMM Jr Pedals as expression pedals. The volume block is going full off and on even when the Mastermind isn’t connected. The other issue is it sounds like I have a pitch shifter on when the pedal is fully backed off.
Your preset has something in common with another "block flickering on/off rapidly" post a few months ago: Viewed with FracTool, there are a couple "ghost" modifiers for blocks that aren't in the preset (Wah 1 & Vol/Pan 2) with no source selected. The Wah 1 modifier has autoengage enabled and it's right after your volume block modifier in the modifier list. These extra modifiers seem impossible to delete--even adding those blocks, creating new modifiers on the listed parameters then removing them leaves 2 modifier entries, but they're both identical Vol/Pan 2 Volume modifiers. I'd try saving individual block files and rebuilding the preset (starting with an empty preset) from those.
The limit is the limit...
No. The gap-less uses more CPU. There's nothing to subtract. Stay below the (same) limit.Subtract the CPU needed for gapless (~1.5%) from the recommended limit (80%) and you're left with about 78%. Voila, there's your revised limit.
Id say yes. I run my AXEIII to my interface with SPDIF and after some play time and running through a half dozen presets with amp/cab channel switching the gaps are gone. It sounds great!
Do you mean the usage is constant, and not a spike at switching time? That would make sense, as that's how CPU utilization applies for blocks. If that's the case, I stand pleasantly corrected.
I'm confused. You don't send multiple CCs for channels, you send multiple values for the same CC.
Actually, that's a fair point - I need to confirm that... But typically CPU use doesn't "spike" dynamically.
I'm making use of the functionality noted below from the manual (specifically the nuance described below in blue which no longer seems to work) - A CC sent with a value beyond 3 always sets the target block to chD now, where as before, a CC sent with a value beyond 3 would select the applicable target block channel based on the sequence (CCvalue4 would set the block to chA, CCvalue5 to chB, CCvalue10 to chC and so on all the way up to CCvalue127 to chD).
As I said, you're talking about multiple CC data values not multiple CCs.