The flaw in this "logic" is it presumes it's about the money. If it were, the updates wouldn't be free. Whenever a new modeling algorithm was written, a new device would be launched and the algorithm would certainly not be ported to legacy devices. Features would be intentionally withheld from less expensive devices to force upgrades to get them.I really hate such a speculation, but is FAS financially alright? It's concerning if the silence means FAS has run out of cash to continue updates at the same pace they used to do...
^^^ This, absolutely.The flaw in this "logic" is it presumes it's about the money. If it were, the updates wouldn't be free. Whenever a new modeling algorithm was written, a new device would be launched and the algorithm would certainly not be ported to legacy devices. Features would be intentionally withheld from less expensive devices to force upgrades to get them.
Everything I've seen in the past 8 years leads me to believe that Cliff does this for the pure enjoyment and satisfaction of creating the best modeling platform and constantly seeking new ways to improve it. Yes, money is great and well deserved, but not really the driving force from what I've observed.
no clue why there's a lull (could speculate all day long), but I believe it would be flawed to say that updates have nothing to do with money. Why do I think this you may ask? Because people are paid significant $ to produce those updates!!!, and those $ would need to be accounted for in the context of a business that needs to make a profit to continue. Are the # and quality of updates very generous compared to competing platforms?, Yessirree!. Would I use the word "free" from an accounting point of view?, No way!. Would I use the word "free" from a marketing point of view?, Sure, why not!.The flaw in this "logic" is it presumes it's about the money. If it were, the updates wouldn't be free.
And then you would get new thread with 5 pages of comments how everything sounds so much better nowSeriously, I'd just release 22.02 with some minor bugfixes only to put this thread to rest
Let me ask. What good is an update to a product that doesn’t need one? Unless I’m missing something. Sound and function ability is absolutely incredible. And, I’ve owned everything under the sun over the last 40 years.I really hate such a speculation, but is FAS financially alright? It's concerning if the silence means FAS has run out of cash to continue updates at the same pace they used to do...
You can always add more amp models, pedals, effects, dynacabs, tetris, etc.Let me ask. What good is an update to a product that doesn’t need one? Unless I’m missing something. Sound and function ability is absolutely incredible. And, I’ve owned everything under the sun over the last 40 years.
For the 14 years I've been around here, many peeps have frequently proclaimed that we are "there" and Axfx does not need another update. Subsequent to every such proclamation, updates have appeared which peeps here overwhelmingly considered to be game changing and revolutionary (to which I would agree in several cases). In every case where many were conviced we were "there", an update then appeared proving that we were not.Let me ask. What good is an update to a product that doesn’t need one?
Pff, how many times my wife had to listen to me that it sounds like a real amp this timeFor the 14 years I've been around here, many peeps here have constantly proclaimed that we are "there" and Axfx does not need a another update. Subsequent to every such proclamation, updates have appeared which peeps here overwhelmingly proclaimed to be game changing and revolutionary (to which I would agree in several cases). In every case where many were conviced we were "there", an update then appeared proving that we were not.
yup - me too, we want to believe it each time, and our partners want to believe that the obsession is finally over so life can resume, but then another update comes along and...Pff, how many times my wife had to listen to me that it sounds like a real amp this time