paulmapp8306
Fractal Fanatic
So. I have tried an Art RCF 312a and 522a previously. The 312 was OK, the 522 much better. This is partly because of the series and partly because of the compression drivers (1" in the 312 2" in the 522).
So I took a trip to the best PA place in a couple of hours drive. I have tried:
a. HK D.A.R.T Monitor. Its OK, but a bit meh for the price. It was the quietest I tried and too mid barky really.
b. FBT 12ma. This was much better. It was smoother than the QSCs (see later) but not as nice as the RFCs or Codas (ditto). It ws not as loud as the QSCs though.
c. QSC K12. I had high hopes hear. It did not live up to them. Very similar to the 12ma, with a slightly more lively top end. It was louder too but that was about it.
d. QSC HPR 122i. I did not like this. It was very similar to the K12, but with a mid spike. It make it sound harsh by comparrison - and the harshest I tried all day. Its not worth anyone changing from a 122 to a K12 IMO - they are too similar - but if you dont already have something theK12 is the better of the two.
e. RCF Art 722a. This was the nicest of "my list". It seemed to have a much flatter response. It made the QSCs seem very "middley" - no bass or trebble detail (by comparrison). It was also louder despite having a spec of 129 SPL (as opposed to 131 of the QSCs).
f. RCF Art 322a. This was the cheapest. It wasnt up to the 722a, but IMO was better than the QSCs. Possible the best bang for buck of the tested speakers.
g. Coda AP12. This was not on my list - In fact Id not heard of it. I tried it because the shop said "If you want flat you want these - there not cheap though". Well I tried them and WOW. Sounded like a real guitar cab. It made ALL the other speakers sound terrible. They all felt "hifi" by comparrison. Too compressed. The QSCs seemed to have a mid spike and the RCFs a md notch bu comparrison. It had a full bass which all the others bar the 722a lacked, and had nice defined highs. It seemed the loudest by far - even though the spec was only 1db more than the QSCs at an SPL of 132 dbs. It is also a co-axial design like the FBTs (which leads to some smoothness) and is a true bi-amp design. This was the one I would take home if I could.
HOWEVER
Prices:
HK D.A.R.T £600
FBT Verve 12 ma £700
QSC K12 £750
QSC HPR 122i £800
RCF 722a £900
RCF 322a £600
Coda RP12 £1300 !!!!!!!!!!
This has left me rather befuddled. The only one I felt I could use as backline (at smaller un-micd venues) was the coda. The others are fine for self monitoring I suppose, but after trying the coda they just didnt feel up to things.
So I know have a choice to make. I can get the RCF 322a (the 722a was not worth the xtra £300 although it ws better - and the the otheres wernt as good to my ears) for self monitoring on bigger stages and continue to use my SLA-1 and VHT 2x12 for backline in smaller places OR save for the coda OR burn all my bridges and sell the SLA and 2x12 to provide the xtra £ for the Coda.
AAAHHHHHHHHHHH I really thought it was either the K12 or one of the RCFs. The Coda RP12 has REALLY put the spanner in the works.
FWIW I think anyone considering a pair of K12s or KPR 122is should have a look at a single Coda RP12 instead. If I had the choice that would be it. It really is better than a pair of the others.
While I sit and try to make sense of my day - heres a link to the Coda for those interested:
http://codaaudio.net/AP12.2-way_coaxial ... red.0.html
So I took a trip to the best PA place in a couple of hours drive. I have tried:
a. HK D.A.R.T Monitor. Its OK, but a bit meh for the price. It was the quietest I tried and too mid barky really.
b. FBT 12ma. This was much better. It was smoother than the QSCs (see later) but not as nice as the RFCs or Codas (ditto). It ws not as loud as the QSCs though.
c. QSC K12. I had high hopes hear. It did not live up to them. Very similar to the 12ma, with a slightly more lively top end. It was louder too but that was about it.
d. QSC HPR 122i. I did not like this. It was very similar to the K12, but with a mid spike. It make it sound harsh by comparrison - and the harshest I tried all day. Its not worth anyone changing from a 122 to a K12 IMO - they are too similar - but if you dont already have something theK12 is the better of the two.
e. RCF Art 722a. This was the nicest of "my list". It seemed to have a much flatter response. It made the QSCs seem very "middley" - no bass or trebble detail (by comparrison). It was also louder despite having a spec of 129 SPL (as opposed to 131 of the QSCs).
f. RCF Art 322a. This was the cheapest. It wasnt up to the 722a, but IMO was better than the QSCs. Possible the best bang for buck of the tested speakers.
g. Coda AP12. This was not on my list - In fact Id not heard of it. I tried it because the shop said "If you want flat you want these - there not cheap though". Well I tried them and WOW. Sounded like a real guitar cab. It made ALL the other speakers sound terrible. They all felt "hifi" by comparrison. Too compressed. The QSCs seemed to have a mid spike and the RCFs a md notch bu comparrison. It had a full bass which all the others bar the 722a lacked, and had nice defined highs. It seemed the loudest by far - even though the spec was only 1db more than the QSCs at an SPL of 132 dbs. It is also a co-axial design like the FBTs (which leads to some smoothness) and is a true bi-amp design. This was the one I would take home if I could.
HOWEVER
Prices:
HK D.A.R.T £600
FBT Verve 12 ma £700
QSC K12 £750
QSC HPR 122i £800
RCF 722a £900
RCF 322a £600
Coda RP12 £1300 !!!!!!!!!!
This has left me rather befuddled. The only one I felt I could use as backline (at smaller un-micd venues) was the coda. The others are fine for self monitoring I suppose, but after trying the coda they just didnt feel up to things.
So I know have a choice to make. I can get the RCF 322a (the 722a was not worth the xtra £300 although it ws better - and the the otheres wernt as good to my ears) for self monitoring on bigger stages and continue to use my SLA-1 and VHT 2x12 for backline in smaller places OR save for the coda OR burn all my bridges and sell the SLA and 2x12 to provide the xtra £ for the Coda.
AAAHHHHHHHHHHH I really thought it was either the K12 or one of the RCFs. The Coda RP12 has REALLY put the spanner in the works.
FWIW I think anyone considering a pair of K12s or KPR 122is should have a look at a single Coda RP12 instead. If I had the choice that would be it. It really is better than a pair of the others.
While I sit and try to make sense of my day - heres a link to the Coda for those interested:
http://codaaudio.net/AP12.2-way_coaxial ... red.0.html