j/k@2112 in your video you show how to connect using trs to dual ts cables but I noticed in input you have black in L/MONO and red in R for the input and then you did RED for L/MONO and black for R for the output.
I always do it like this.
TIP (black cable) L/MONO and RING (red cable) RIGHT from the VP4 INPUT to the SEND on the AM4.
TIP (black cable) L/MONO and RING (red cable) RIGHT from the VP4 OUTPUT to the RETURN on the AM4.
Did I connect mine wrong or does it matter?
It'll just flip the L/R channels.
Thanks!I think your method is correct, you'll have the left channel go to the left and right to right whereas mine will be backwards. I honestly didn't even notice I'd done that in my vid.Ok then I'll fix that tomorrow since I did it wrongThanks!
I think your method is correct, you'll have the left channel go to the left and right to right whereas mine will be backwards. I honestly didn't even notice I'd done that in my vid.
I wonder which way is better. Going from VP4 to the inserts of AM4. Then AM4 out to the axefx 3.
Or doing spdif out of am4 to vp4 spdif in and vp4 outputs to axefx 3.
Speak the following mantras in the voice of Thomas Nordegg.It'll just flip the L/R channels.
Different sizing, different usage, different purpose.why would you ever do this and not get an FM9?
Smaller and modular!why not get an FM9?
why would you ever do this and not get an FM9?

polite? how else could I have said it? I don't think the way i set the question is rude or anything in any way, i m sorry if you felt that way thoughDifferent sizing, different usage, different purpose.
You can take the AM4 alone at a gig (and the same goes with the VP4 if you have an analog rig or other ways)
PS: Why not being more polite?
A wise man once said "It's easier to chain an AM4 to a VP4 than it is to chainsaw an FM9" or something like that