I agree that there are some threads that are ignorant but I don't know if this could be counted as being purely ignorant... if so then equally on both sides. Imagine this kind of a scenario: I state an opinion: "I have never really liked Aerosmith's guitar tones". Would it cause this kind of drama? I'm actually pretty sure no one would even state the experience/budget/knowledge behind those tones. Why? Because everyone has a right to an opinion and the experience/budget/knowledge wouldn't make me like the tones more. Freedom of speech is not reality these days and IMO this is a good example of it.
I actually thought about this today and realized that no one tried to help me. That would be my first response if someone stated f.ex. that "Axe-Fx II is not working for me". I would say: "Try the Yellow Triaxis channel it always sounds good and try this and that IR". So my conclusion was that while at the same time everyone didn't like that I didn't like this product, they still trust my ability to use this product. Well... I've been hyping IR importance before FAS was doing it. I'm the one who was tone matching before it was a feature in the Axe-Fx. I'm in a deeeeep rabbit hole with this whole IR thing and people might not know where I'm coming from... in the first post I said: I AM PICKY!
I guess I wasn't clear enough.
People saw you jump to conclusions without all of the information and read Cliffs first statement (which seems annoyed in tone) which led them to get defensive.
The first failing: you not having all of the information, and giving advice based on this. It happens everyone and we suck it up. No harm done usually. It happened to me last week FWIW. I apologised and moved on, and so well I should.
The second failing: The first Mod comment being dismissive. If there's a claim being made, even in ignorance, a Mods job is to clarify information which led to the misunderstanding if the other isn't being a troll, and if they are, to discipline them.
A tiered system could combat this, but can also lead to people with genuine findings being ignored, could stop the flow of knowledge sharing and WILL lead to elitism (academic and otherwise) within the forum. With Mods not being dismissive to a genuine claim we wouldn't need a tiered system.
Some of the best tones I've heard have been by bedroom musicians and amateurs. Just because someone has worked with U2 (for example) doesn't make them the best person to record an orchestra, and in much the same way, they may not be the best person to capture an IR.
So where does that leave things? Needing a qualification to capture an IR or build a tone? Needing some form of validation (professional or otherwise) to sound an opinion on a guitar tone? Both would be ridiculous.
There are a lot of people who get their feelings hurt by a perceived criticism.
I would like to thank Cliff for clarifying how the IRs were captured, and defending his product in a mature way. That's why I like the forum here and FAS products in general. There's no sales B.S. from management.
For everyone else, if you're offended, you would be better served by growing up and moving on. You're not helping the fanboy image.