I do agree here, they could have made the outputs TRS so you could split them that way. I may use it as a post fx only though and would have stereo then at least.Is it confirmed that if you send PRE FX to the font of your amp you are limited to MONO POST FX? If true, that's the only real "WFT were they thinking" that I've seen.
According to the manual, you can’t have stereo effect loops. So I wouldn’t be able to have dual tonex ones in the loop. Huge bummer
Analyzing here, in summary the VP4 (FX4) is practically an FM3. however:don't think so - but great for what it is.
Price? I think VP4 will be cheaper than FM9 or even FM3Educate me on this. Why not just use the FM9 with Out 3 as an effects only unit and not have any reason at all to purchase whatever this is?
To save close to $1000 if you have no interest in amp modelingEducate me on this. Why not just use the FM9 with Out 3 as an effects only unit and not have any reason at all to purchase whatever this is?
It seems to have I/O optimized for an amp. The FM3 does not have this. (Though I believe the FM9 DOES)Analyzing here, in summary the VP4 (FX4) is practically an FM3. however:
- without Amp
- without Cab/IR
- 435 effects
- Has 104 Total Presets
- Can be used as Preset Mode
- Can be used as Scene Mode
- Can be used as Effects Mode
- Has Tap Tempo / Animator
- Has 4 Footswitches
- Has 4 Blocks per preset
- Has 4 Scenes per preset
- Has 4 channels per block.
- Inputs for 2 Expression Pedals
- has Envelope Follower
- has ADSR
- has Sequencer
- has Modifier
- has Pitch Detector
- Has Midi In/out.
- Has Effects Loop (Send/ Return).
Hope that one has a CAB Block at least.I'm holding out for the inevitable VP8.
Well, sure. The paradigm for studio use is typically to record dry and then add effects in post.if you are performing live yes - but not for in the studio.
I may use it as a post fx only though and would have stereo then at least.
Well, I rarely played the 4cm method. Too cumbersome for live use. Unless the FX unit is in the rack next to the amp.Is it confirmed that if you send PRE FX to the font of your amp you are limited to MONO POST FX? If true, that's the only real "WFT were they thinking" that I've seen.
I'm curious about this. Do you currently use 2 Tonex pedals now, in parallel at the same time? If so, are you using the same models/captures in both? That would be cool, but I'd worry about phase issues resulting from potentially varying latency times.
I have Tonex One, and have thought about grabbing another now that they are adding effects. This would be a super tiny backup rig for my FM9. Probably connecting them serially, rather than parallel - but being able to run two amps at once without phase issues would be epic.
Just get an FM9 at that point lol.Hope that one has a CAB Block at least.
Tell that to Andy Timmons and Andy Woods to name a few. U accept students?Compression? Guitar lessons.