Fender Tone Master Pro....

Status
Not open for further replies.
I get it, but I think they may be following a better path than selling tone master replicas, cyber twins, etc.
Put the Fender franchise in a floor modeller, perfect it, sell modellers, tube amps and FR cabs…move on.

They should license Fractal's models for some of the Fender amps and release them as Tone Masters. Partially because it would be funny. And probably better. (JMHO)
 
I get it, but I think they may be following a better path than selling tone master replicas, cyber twins, etc.
Put the Fender franchise in a floor modeller, perfect it, sell modellers, tube amps and FR cabs…move on.
Only time will tell if this a better path than so many previous Fender products. I think $1,700 is a chunk to plop down on something that could potentially be totally abandoned within just a few years. I think that's a totally valid concern for anyone considering the product.
 
Because of more and more cheap but great chinese guitars flooding the market. After so many years of guitar playing I replaced mostly all of my guitars from Gibson and Fender with chinese ones (and I have much much more than in past), e.g. the SGs with maple neck are better then Gibsons. The rest is as good as the expensive ones. Additionally the old rocker generation dies and real guitar heros are missing. New generation players will mostly play modelers and chinese guitars, I think. Refer to
https://www.br.de/nachrichten/wirtschaft/nach-der-gibson-pleite-gitarrenbauer-in-der-krise,Qqsshem translated from German in English:
"After the Gibson bankruptcy: guitar makers in crisis
The American musical instrument manufacturer Gibson is best known for its electric guitars. The company has now filed for bankruptcy. The Gibson bankruptcy is just a symptom of the crisis this industry is in. By Stephan Lina. For decades, rock music has stood for dynamism and hope, but the biggest stars of the genre are getting older - and with them the fans. This is a problem for electric guitar manufacturers. The industry thrives not least on idols who motivate young customers to pick up the guitar themselves.
More competition, lower demand
The numbers speak for themselves. Last year, only one million electric guitars were sold worldwide, a third less than ten years ago. In addition, the number of providers has grown. This means that more and more manufacturers are fighting for a shrinking market. This represents an existential threat, particularly for the rather high-priced US providers.
Beginning of an industry crisis?
According to industry experts, Gibson's bankruptcy could be the beginning of a whole wave. Competitor Fender is also heavily in debt; competitor Paul Reed Smith has already had to start a restructuring program. But it's not just the manufacturers who are affected. Guitar Center, the most important retailer in the US market, is struggling with shrinking sales and a growing mountain of debt.
"
P.S: I also replaced my tube amps and cabs with Fractal ... Things change.
Which brand or seller?

I want a les Paul but certainly don’t want to spend 3000€ on a Gibson.
 
Only time will tell if this a better path than so many previous Fender products. I think $1,700 is a chunk to plop down on something that could potentially be totally abandoned within just a few years. I think that's a totally valid concern for anyone considering the product.
Yes…agreed
 
Mine was delivered today. Honestly I love it. It's not in depth as the fractal, but the UI is much better, very intuitive, and user friendly. The sounds are pretty damn good too. I honestly think the EVH models sound better than the Fractal versions of them. I've played it for about an hour and am throughly impressed.
I am very happy you are enjoying it. I ordered mine on Tuesday. I am looking forward to it arriving. I am very interested in sitting down and actually being able to A/B it with my FM3. To me that will be the truest form of where Fender sits in the digital world.

Rod
 
But I can't understand, that you really like the user interface of the Fender. Yes, it looks fancy but I also don't like to work with tablet at the office. To be productive I need a mouse, a large screen and a keyboard. That's why I like Fractal too. The user interface of Fractal is easy to use, if you take time to learn - it's really productive. The Axe III editor is great and gives you all possibilities. I don't want a touch screen on a floor board, I want knobs and keys and all together easy to reach. For a touch screen the screen is too small. Players eyes getting older and there is not enough space to design presets with large fingers. Reliablity is another topic. This is a kids toy but not an professional tool. Do you really need great images of the amps? Yes, it helps to select the right one but for configuration it's useless.
Not sure I like the touch screen but I do think that the ft swtchs working as control knobs is very useful. The QC has the same thing so probably the switches are sturdy enough. Besides I would use the TMP as a table top unit depending on how well the midi implementation is for controlling parameters etc. via midi floor footswitch. In any case, every current youtube reviewer had really no problem understanding how to get around the UI without a receiving a manual. Fairly sure a newbie to a fractal unit would not be able to do this as well. Of course you can learn the Fractal system but there is that saying of 'more playing time and less tweaking' that I think is a real factor. Whether you think it is a toy without really getting your hands on is kind of subjective but I understand what you mean. It is really to early to call whether this modeler will have much effect in the modeling world but at least a company like Fender now thinks it is part of their future.
 
I am very happy you are enjoying it. I ordered mine on Tuesday. I am looking forward to it arriving. I am very interested in sitting down and actually being able to A/B it with my FM3. To me that will be the truest form of where Fender sits in the digital world.

Rod
Yes, I would like to hear some sound comparisons using the same playback system. Maybe even the new Fender FRFR amp/cabs.. It is obvious that the UI is much easier to use and that is a big advantage as long as the tones are there. Not many reviews have mentioned the IRs that are available and how they sound. I am sure more in depth reviews will be forthcoming. I have owned an FM3 and now an FM9 turbo along with a HX Stomp on a pedal board. The FM3 really took me awhile to get used to the UI but now feel fairly comfortable with the FM9 version. The HX Stomp was a breeze to learn and the amp sounds are good enough for my looping system. The cost of the TMP does seem a bit high but if(?) Fender supports this unit with firmware updates over time I think that mitigate some of the complaints.
 
What's crazy is I have an Axe FX III and the only thing I use it for is for the Fender amp sims and the various pedals. So when this came out I was like "a box by Fender that models Fender amps? Yes please."

However, I still can't quite say that it gets the fender amp sound as accurate as the Axe FX III. What do you guys think?

I got real close to trading my axe in for a Dream 65 and some external pedals, but it still didn't impress me like the axe's Fedner models did.
 
FWIW this whole UI of Fractal being too complicated by some and the industry in general really baffled me when I first entered in a serious way the modeling world 2 1/2 years ago. For the most part and up until then I had looked at modeling as no where near the quality for serious players and somewhat of a gimmick. Remember I had yet to experience a Fractal device. I had messed with the red kidney over 20 years ago (sent it back) and Guitar Rig on the PC. I always thought using graphics of amps and FX pedals with knobs was silly and just made it more gimmicky. However overall the sound and feel was what always kept me away.

When I received the FM3 with the great FM Edit utility (excellent sound quality aside) I was like “finally a professional piece of gear with a professional UI”!. Whether it is 100% like building and designing your own amp it certainly comes close. I wouldn’t expect anything less from a pro piece of gear. I don’t want the designers to be limited because they have to match the virtual parameters to the real knobs and buttons on the actual thing they’re modeling. Add in the sound quality, touch sensitivity and every other excellent aspect of Fractal and it’s a no brainer.

If I let all the learning curves I had to overcome through the years of really great gear keep me from experiencing the very best I would be such a lesser person. The Fractal UI is exactly what I want and hope they’re never pushed away from it. This doesn’t mean that I wouldn’t welcome any efficiencies that the smart people at FAS devise. Like someone said “nothing is ever perfect” and improvements when needed, should be implemented. Not being afraid of adding improvements is something FAS can never be accused of not doing!😉

So that’s my way more than $.02 worth of opinion.
 
A Fender rep also said on TGP that they "plan to release firmware updates roughly every 6 months." And that "each channel of the EVH 5150 took about 3 months of development time."

So... by their own timelines, it doesn't sound like they'll provide the kind of long-term support and updates we've been used to with other prominent modelers. Who knows, we'll see.
 
FWIW this whole UI of Fractal being too complicated by some and the industry in general really baffled me when I first entered in a serious way the modeling world 2 1/2 years ago. For the most part and up until then I had looked at modeling as no where near the quality for serious players and somewhat of a gimmick. Remember I had yet to experience a Fractal device. I had messed with the red kidney over 20 years ago (sent it back) and Guitar Rig on the PC. I always thought using graphics of amps and FX pedals with knobs was silly and just made it more gimmicky. However overall the sound and feel was what always kept me away.

When I received the FM3 with the great FM Edit utility (excellent sound quality aside) I was like “finally a professional piece of gear with a professional UI”!. Whether it is 100% like building and designing your own amp it certainly comes close. I wouldn’t expect anything less from a pro piece of gear. I don’t want the designers to be limited because they have to match the virtual parameters to the real knobs and buttons on the actual thing they’re modeling. Add in the sound quality, touch sensitivity and every other excellent aspect of Fractal and it’s a no brainer.

If I let all the learning curves I had to overcome through the years of really great gear keep me from experiencing the very best I would be such a lesser person. The Fractal UI is exactly what I want and hope they’re never pushed away from it. This doesn’t mean that I wouldn’t welcome any efficiencies that the smart people at FAS devise. Like someone said “nothing is ever perfect” and improvements when needed, should be implemented. Not being afraid of adding improvements is something FAS can never be accused of not doing!😉

So that’s my way more than $.02 worth of opinion.
A really good post for the Fractal side of things. I think the idea of building a new kind of amp or remodeling a current one is one of the best aspects and features of the Fractal systems. However that probably is not what many new players to the modeling world might be interested in. Ease of use and familiarity will go along way towards moving new comers into purchasing a modeler IMO. That is as long as the amp tones and affects are good enough relative to the competition. No one wants a dog especially at this price level. The fact that Fender also released several new FRFR amp/cabs that look like older Fender products may give them a boost. On the Fractal side, it amazes me that with all the features and nuances that are available to tweak that many will settle for just one build preset that has some scene/channel changes etc, and that's it. There are a few that dive deep and try to get the most out of a fractal unit but I really do not think that it is many. As far as 'professional gear' goes I believe that whatever works for you and is of good build quality may fit that definition. FAS has always been in a different modeling category than other modelers and that may fit well with some but not for others. The new TMP is really going in a different direction similar to Line 6 or maybe even the QC, we will just have to wait and see how this all plays out.
 
Which brand or seller?

I want a les Paul but certainly don’t want to spend 3000€ on a Gibson.

In Germany:

Thomann Shop: Harley Benton
Kirstein Shop: Rocktile Pro, e.g. the Les Paul
Music Store Pro Shop: J&D
Ebay in past: Vision Strats

Plan to exchange the pickups for the last 20% of sound, but the modern ones are much better than in past.

I often bought the SGs used, because in past the SGs had a more original shape like the originals, e.g. the J&D GG1S (not usable/comparable anymore) or Rocktile Pro S-Red (here the shop images are still the old ones).
 
Last edited:
Can it be that they've licensed BIAS FX and called it a day?
I mean.. it looks so much like Positive Grid products I can't tell a difference
In this case the updates is not something to worry about, only sounds

Same strategy ... Softube software was the basis for Marshall Code series. This was a one time story. I think it depends on the future goal/target of Fender and success of Positive Grid in future. Could become expensive for Fender to release SW updates all the time ... I just know it from Marshall, some bug fixed firmware updates, reduced APP updates but no new features/sounds and bad support and bad reliablity.
Just refer to: https://my.marshall.com/forum/questions?filterTags=2
 
Last edited:
Could become expensive for Fender to release SW updates all the time
They might not need to - they could outsource this. Replace the pedal graphics in the release, test, deploy - as simple as that.
Of course it is not this simple, but in a nutshell this is how it can work.

Does anyone has BIAS FX2 and time to make a comparison? :)
 
Yes, but I think Fender needs to pay for reuse of new parts of the SW all the time. But possibly a user can use the SW updates directly from Positive Grid in future and Fender just sells the HW anymore -> SW Support by Positive Grid?
 
Last edited:
Hey Maurice, what is your best guess to the tone control settings to be "neutral"? Twelve o'clock, or maxed?
Thanks! (getting mine on Monday...)
Tip is to always start with all the EQ at 12 o'clock, and work from there if needed.
In the case of the FR12 I would also start with the Cut at 1, basically meaning that you will not filter out any high frequencies from your initial signal.
The output from the FR12 will just sent the original signal out from the FM9 to a PA or any other device.
 
I promised to come back with the results after yesterdays' rehearsal.
Overall: good investment, and I think I will enjoy this FR12 being used live in the future.
My band plays rock and modern blues, think: Philip Sayce, Gov't Mule, Joe Bonamassa, John Mayer Trio, Henrik Freischlader, etc ... (yes, I have some fun as a guitar player :cool:). The drummer is pretty loud, and the bass keeps up with him, hehehe... So the main challenge is to fit in the mix and be heard. And that worked very well!
Overall, the tones I have dialed in with the headphones where quite on par with the sound coming from the speakers in the FR12. And they blended in nicely with the rest of the band, and also solo's stuck out. I have tilted the FR12 backwards in the rehearsal room which I would also advice to do so.
In short: This is the best FR in my experience so far, and will be a keeper for future live sessions. The adapted Fender Supersonic 2x12 with FR12-X200 (powered with SD Powerstage 200) also works very nicely, but is twice the weight. And being an old rock dude with 52 years live experience, my back loves me for making less weighted live decisions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom