Jonathan Thomas
Inspired
Immense! Thank you! Can't wait to try it!There are already Mark I users beta testing it.
Immense! Thank you! Can't wait to try it!There are already Mark I users beta testing it.
Now that would be awesome - I would love a Mikko equivalent for Yorkaudio in conjunction with Fractal.I also wonder if Justin Is working w him to some extent,a York/FAS collab would be ridiculous
I guess this would be too much for the FM3 power......I hope to be wrong
Dude, you really are a mad scientist/genius, aren’t you? Amazing.Content producers can make their own Dyna-Cabs but they will need to rent our robot and software. We have a second robot for just that.
I don't think so. Basically what it has to do is interpolate between different IRs representing the various mic positions and once that is done, behind the scenes it churns out an IR file which will then be used in your cab sim slot just like using any IR.I guess this would be too much for the FM3 power......I hope to be wrong
He said a few posts above, they will have to rent it.I wonder if FAS will "loan out" their extra robot to the bigger IR makers so there are a few Dyna-Cabs from each company included in the unit, like the IRs we have now?
I saw that....I'm talking about cabs included in the unit, not for sale......totally different thing.He said a few posts above, they will have to rent it.
In fact, When line 6 release their new cabs and visual thing in another block, they said this use less cpu than the ir block. Just for informationI don’t know if it’s really that cpu hungry, more a way of swapping between a bunch of different IR’s with a different variable such as mic position by turning a knob, instead of having to go and load a different IR manually
Basically same as Two Notes etc do, unless I’m totally missing something
You don't need proximity. It's inherently there because you have a Distance control. This is "real" proximity vs. simulated.I'm so hoping Smoothing and Proximity are available for these cabs too.
This ^^, I suspect while Cliff Implemented his own way, in theory like the Helix they should use Less DSP , but I'm just guessingI don't think so. Basically what it has to do is interpolate between different IRs representing the various mic positions and once that is done, behind the scenes it churns out an IR file which will then be used in your cab sim slot just like using any IR.
It's really more of a question whether FM3 has the storage space for all those new IRs needed for this. I do expect this will show up on the FM3/9 as well.
If not, then ML Sound Lab MIKKO lets you do the same "move a virtual mic on a virtual speaker" thing in a VST plugin, then export your mix as an IR you could load on the FM3. They just released MIKKO 2 with 38 different cabs.
Eggplant emojiFor those who are interested:
We chose "quality-over-quantity" for this.
The resulting IRs are 2K samples (as opposed to 1K on other products).
We use a higher spatial sampling frequency (I know what the spatial sampling is on the other products but I won't divulge that out of respect).
I've developed a new alignment technique that perfectly aligns all IRs without destroying phase information (NOT minimum-phase). So you can combine IRs from different cabs/mics without phase problems. This also eliminates the "phasiness" you hear with other approaches.
We captured the IRs at a new studio built by an industry veteran who worked at Power Station and Sony and produced Michael Jackson, Los Lonely Boys, Roberta Flack, et. al.
Sounds really good.
I expected you would use the Dynamount units for the robot. What makes yours different, if it's not a secret? I understand if you have special software to use for capturing and mapping the IRs.Content producers can make their own Dyna-Cabs but they will need to rent our robot and software. We have a second robot for just that.
yes I am interested in how this can be implemented for the FM3 - if not on the unit then a cablab 4? very exciting timesThis ^^, I suspect while Cliff Implemented his own way, in theory like the Helix they should use Less DSP , but I'm just guessing
It would be sad if new Dyna Cabs could not be Implemented in the FM 3
We chose "quality-over-quantity" for this.