yeky83
Power User
Right. Now we see the silliness in comparing your measurements to the CLR anechoic measurement, and so on.Okay. Here's what you're asking for yek83. One var smoothing, the other ERB smoothing.
View attachment 110301
View attachment 110302
No, I already went over this.Now ERB takes into account the difference in the ear's ability to discern bandwidth differences, it makes sense to use the ERB smoothing to flatten a curve instead of the var smoothing. Why waste your EQ points in an area that the ear can't hear gaps as well as at the top end?
Here's the wiki description of ERB:
"ERB is a measure used in psychoacoustics, which gives an approximation to the bandwidths of the filters in human hearing, using the unrealistic but convenient simplification of modeling the filters as rectangular band-pass filters."
Again, REW recommends other smoothing filters for a reason. ERB is a concept to learn, then you can use other less drastic smoothing filters to make interpretations.
They are for neutral monitoring.These are not crappy speakers.
Anybody can correct their speaker, you don't need to tweak your nipples over room reflections and other things unless you really want to.
Here's a good video for correcting your speakers. All it takes is a $100 microphone and an equalizer (preferably analog).
You're not correcting your speaker. This video doesn't show speaker correction, it shows sound system (speaker + room + listening position) correction by using REW, Room Equalization Wizard. You're "tweaking your nipples over room reflections" and are doing it badly.