USB 2.0 specify a maximum cable length of 5 meters and the specification requires the cable delay to be less than ~5 nanoseconds per meter. So i wouldn't worry about itMaybe there is a difference with really long cable lengths, I'm not sure, but someone else here will know and hopefully comment.
RB
Thanks for your replys, I was interested because I was using a usual USB cable and switched to another by chance, I can hear a very slight difference by the recorded tracks with the same setup and different USB cable.[/url]
I know, name me crazy but it does sound a slight cleaner!! I recorded a dry track, reamped it through the old cable then through the other USB cable to can listen the difference in the playback, I didn't heard it at tracking itself.This is quite literally impossible. As long as the signal is going through, it is going to be the exact same thing. That's the upside of digital.
I know, name me crazy but it does sound a slight cleaner!! I recorded a dry track, reamped it through the old cable then through the other USB cable to can listen the difference in the playback, I didn't heard it at tracking itself.
No. You thought you did; unless one cable is defective and producing noise, they are the same tonally.I know, name me crazy but it does sound a slight cleaner!! I recorded a dry track, reamped it through the old cable then through the other USB cable to can listen the difference in the playback, I didn't heard it at tracking itself.
Well, did you clean the connectors first?
I was interested because I was using a usual USB cable and switched to another by chance, I can hear a very slight difference by the recorded tracks with the same setup and different USB cable.