+1 on eliminating as many variables as possible, particularly mic choice and position. Dynacabs are great for this because you know exactly what you are getting and have a lot of control.I do what I would do with a real cabinet: use a ribbon and a dynamic mic in different positions on the same speaker. Then I use that same speaker/mic set up on EVERY scene and preset so that the audience (and the desk engineer) get continuity.
I generally use the same impulse response pair across all of my live presets.
When mixing, I use anything.
Leon discusses this here regarding the live context.
good luck mixing in a large venue when the guitarist keeps switching their cabs.cant say i agree w leon on this one. in a cover band doing a wide variety of songs, not switching up cabs seems a waste of the modeler's potential
lol
You would lose cohesion and possibly a bit of the audience. Not worth the hassle.cant say i agree w leon on this one. in a cover band doing a wide variety of songs, not switching up cabs seems a waste of the modeler's potential
In theory the sound system is supposed to be tuned to the room so that it will faithfully reproduce the sound from the mixer. Then the mixer is used only to actually mix the signals from the band and not to correct for the room acoustics.cant say i agree w leon on this one. in a cover band doing a wide variety of songs, not switching up cabs seems a waste of the modeler's potential