WOW! That is something different.I know @hippietim had 3 units in parallel to process each string with a dedicated signal path
I found Tim's thread here:WOW! That is something different.
Thanks - not sure how I copied the wrong link, I'll fix my post.
...but, technically in parallel, innit?WOW! That is something different.
I SPDIF'd a FM3 into a FM9 for a little bit for 3 amp models in parallel plus a 4th parrallel piezo IR path. It was pretty freakin awesome!I did FM9+FX3 for a good while, until the FM9 firmware was mature and dialed in enough to cover what I needed on its own....
I don't think so, he's feeding the first and second into the third via the SPDIF and applying "global" effects in the last FX3. Wouldn't parallel be each unit's outputs to a mixer?...but, technically in parallel, innit?
The units are connected together via S/PDIF so everything stays in the digital domain:
Axe-FX A - strings 1 & 2 via inputs 3 & 4
Axe-FX B - strings 3 & 4 via inputs 3 & 4, strings 1 & 2 via S/PDIF in
Axe-FX C - strings 5 & 6 via inputs 3 & 4, strings 1, 2, 3, 4 via S/PDIF in
So Axe-FX C is the final output and a good place to apply global reverb and such.
That's a tough one to call, then. The outputs are each feeding the next unit serially instead of mixing at a mixer, but the inputs are coming in parallelly via the three sets of input 3 & 4....I don't think so, he's feeding the first and second into the third via the SPDIF and applying "global" effects in the last FX3. Wouldn't parallel be each unit's outputs to a mixer?
Imagine programming it (I programmed it). We’d A/B fuzz pedals, multiple H9s, piezos, midi control strymons before tour. 2 axefxsWant to know if there is someone who plugged multiple Axe Fx III's into each other for a crazy rig? There has to be the most absurd trial of this somewhere. I think back in day Dweezil did like 2 Axe Fx II's.
...but, technically in parallel, innit?