Monitors suggestion

ezellohar

Member
Hello, sorry for opening another monitor thread, but I'm in need of advice. I need to change my old monitors and also I moved, so my new room will be different.

My new music room is 4x6.5m with the PC on one end, on the shorter wall.
After a long research, I'm settled on thinking on Neumann's KH 120 II as nearfield monitors. But, I'd like to use my speakers also to play guitar, axe or acoustic when reharsing with my acoustic band there: we usually go via IEM, but sometimes a speaker can come handy. The neumanns, while awesome for nearfield monitoring, I guess they will be less than optimal to listen at the other end of the room, in a moderately high volume environment (we have an acoustic violin, so at least the volume should be at that level).
So, what can you suggest? Going to two different systems, one for nearfield and the other for, let's call it midfield, or is there a jack-of-all trades that can work for both purposes?
Budget can go as high as 2k€, but I won't get angry saving some :D
 
Your room is treated?
Thank you, I forgot to mention it. It'll be partially, but at the moment I have yet to start working on that (after moving, other rooms took priority lol). I'll treat to the best of my abilities, but on the wall opposite of the daw, I have two doors which I estimate to be a huge problem acoustically.
But my aim is to have good balanced acoustics sitting at the daw, for the rest of the room just 'decent' will be enough.
 
The neumanns, while awesome for nearfield monitoring, I guess they will be less than optimal to listen at the other end of the room, in a moderately high volume environment (we have an acoustic violin, so at least the volume should be at that level).

I would say not to "decide" until you actually hear them in your room - so buy somewhere that has a return policy. But, the "issue" with using nearfields from farther away is just volume. You'll probably just have to try it. My suspicion is that you'll be okay as long as you're not trying to keep up with a bass amp or drums.

But my aim is to have good balanced acoustics sitting at the daw, for the rest of the room just 'decent' will be enough.

That also very much depends on what "decent" means to you and the details of how the room works out. It actually isn't possible to have "the same" sound all over the room - there's always going to be a sweet spot.

The doors probably aren't that big of a problem unless you want/need isolation. Some of the bass escaping the room is generally a good thing, and you can hang treatments from the doors.
 
I would say not to "decide" until you actually hear them in your room - so buy somewhere that has a return policy. But, the "issue" with using nearfields from farther away is just volume. You'll probably just have to try it. My suspicion is that you'll be okay as long as you're not trying to keep up with a bass amp or drums.
That's a good advice, Thomann will be my best friend, I'm gonna try at least 2-3 different sets.


That also very much depends on what "decent" means to you and the details of how the room works out. It actually isn't possible to have "the same" sound all over the room - there's always going to be a sweet spot.
Yeah, that I know. My focus will be on creating the sweet spot sitting at my desktop.

That said, what are my options? Focusing on volume, I think woofer size would matter (bigger=less distortion at higher volumes) for the rest of the room, not so much for nearfield monitoring.

What would you do? one set or two? and what? the ones I'd like to try are: Kali lp6 v2 and neumann kh120 ii, then for something bigger adam a7v/t7v, genelec (i'd like the 8050 but they're expensive! 8040 are the max I can get). anything else available in EU in the same ballpark I should consider?
 
I’d get the nearfield speakers that sound good to you, and band speakers of whatever sort placed nearer the band whenever that occurs.

Nearfield listening is a very specific use where the location of the listener and treating in that area are critical to optimal results. Compromising the position of the listener or spec’ing components that focus at three times the distance isn’t likely to produce reliable mixing at the desk. I won’t say impossible, because I’m sure someone uses crazy speaker configs and gets great results. But on average, it’s hard enough just to get a reliable tonality in one position!

PA type columns or wedges like the EV PXM12MP work well for getting a decent band-level sound into a small space.

If the focus of your space is recording and personal work, I’d start with the NFs that sound best to you, making do with how it sounds for the band until you can add additional speakers (or ask them to bring something). As it often is with music, “do it all” solutions are just a positive spin on “does a mediocre job on each thing.”

That’s the way I decided to go.
 
That's a good advice, Thomann will be my best friend, I'm gonna try at least 2-3 different sets.

The last time I bought speakers, I think I bought & returned 6 sets. It's exciting to get a new set, but I hate shopping for speakers.

What would you do? one set or two? and what? the ones I'd like to try are: Kali lp6 v2 and neumann kh120 ii, then for something bigger adam a7v/t7v, genelec (i'd like the 8050 but they're expensive! 8040 are the max I can get). anything else available in EU in the same ballpark I should consider?

All of those are "small nearfields", even the 8050. It's more than just a couple inches of driver size that determines that.

If you want multiple sets of nearfields for your desk, that's when you should consider multiple sets of that type of speaker. If you want a separate set of speakers for the "band", I would do something else.

FWIW, I know I'm in the minority, but I've never really understood the point of having multiple sets of speakers for mixing/producing. Yes, I learned that way...with big soffit-mounted mains and usually 1-2 sets of nearfields on the meter bridge. But, I don't like it. Either one set of speakers is in the way of another set or at least one set creates a compromised stereo image.

Just about the only way to get around that is if one set is soffit mains mounted up towards the wall/ceiling edge. But, that excites more room modes than putting speakers at ear height. And, you have to figure out your ideal speaker/listening position before you start building the room...it's a very expensive proposition.

Anyway...what I would do...

It kind of depends on how you're treating the space and the kind of sound you want for the band. "Ideal" would be to have separate live and control rooms - but I'm well aware that that isn't always possible in a home studio.

I'd focus the treatment/layout on the "mix" position and then see about some kind of decent PA speaker that I could have set up wider at the front of the room.

E.g.,

Start with figuring out the ideal listening position for the room. That's where your chair goes. Put the desk in front of it and the speakers on or in front of that based on minimizing SBIR (which will depend on how you're treating the front wall). Assuming you have traps in the front corners, I'd probably look into something like line-array/column PA speakers (mostly because of size) set up "too wide" either as far forward on the side wall or as far to the sides of the front wall as possible.

At least in my head, that would make the "band" speakers interfere with the "mixing" speakers the least. The band speakers might also sound more exciting/lively from being so close to a corner - not at all ideal if you want a neutral sound, but possibly more engaging for band practice.

The other good alternative would be to run the Fractal through an FRFR (or just another speaker) and let the rest of the band make their own sound. I've used an old set of KRK Rokits for that (and literally placed them in the room where I would put a guitar amp), and the hyped sound that makes them bad for mixing actually makes them pretty awesome for a relatively low-volume guitar monitor. The sound changes as you move around, but the same thing is true for stage wedges or actual guitar amps.

(ETA: Forgot a couple things. I'm kind of hesitant to make speaker recommendations - it's a really personal choice. For nearfields, I do like Neumann and Genelec, and on the more budget side, I still think the JBL LSRs win. I also really dislike Kali and Adam. But, you really do have to try them yourself. The room is a huge part of the equation, as well as what you want to hear. The other side of it is that headphones and IEMs have come such a long way in the last few years that if you can find a set that actually works for you and figure out a bunch of little details - correction, your preferred target curve, crossfeed, etc. - there's a decent choice in gear that sounds more accurate/neutral/revealing than just about any speakers in most rooms until you're talking about a 5-figure investment. It's nowhere near as simple as just putting on headphones, and I don't like any of the all-in-one packages like VSX, NX, etc.. But, that doesn't solve the problem of band sound. If you like the idea of working that way and are willing to put in the time to figure it out, it could mean that you only need "big" speakers for the band and when you want to shake the room and just use the headphones/IEMs for the actual "work".)

Nearfield listening is a very specific use where the location of the listener and treating in that area are critical to optimal results. Compromising the position of the listener or spec’ing components that focus at three times the distance isn’t likely to produce reliable mixing at the desk. I won’t say impossible, because I’m sure someone uses crazy speaker configs and gets great results. But on average, it’s hard enough just to get a reliable tonality in one position!

One approach would be to just not make any compromises for the sound on the other side of the room. You'll still hear the nearfields - you just won't get the volume or stereo image that you would from a more dedicated solution. But, you're not going to give correct stereo image to the whole band no matter what you do....so it really just depends on how loud the band plays and what the back of the room sounds like.

If the focus of your space is recording and personal work, I’d start with the NFs that sound best to you, making do with how it sounds for the band until you can add additional speakers (or ask them to bring something). As it often is with music, “do it all” solutions are just a positive spin on “does a mediocre job on each thing.”

Agreed.
 
Last edited:
The last time I bought speakers, I think I bought & returned 6 sets. It's exciting to get a new set, but I hate shopping for speakers.



All of those are "small nearfields", even the 8050. It's more than just a couple inches of driver size that determines that.

If you want multiple sets of nearfields for your desk, that's when you should consider multiple sets of that type of speaker. If you want a separate set of speakers for the "band", I would do something else.

FWIW, I know I'm in the minority, but I've never really understood the point of having multiple sets of speakers for mixing/producing. Yes, I learned that way...with big soffit-mounted mains and usually 1-2 sets of nearfields on the meter bridge. But, I don't like it. Either one set of speakers is in the way of another set or at least one set creates a compromised stereo image.

Just about the only way to get around that is if one set is soffit mains mounted up towards the wall/ceiling edge. But, that excites more room modes than putting speakers at ear height. And, you have to figure out your ideal speaker/listening position before you start building the room...it's a very expensive proposition.

Anyway...what I would do...

It kind of depends on how you're treating the space and the kind of sound you want for the band. "Ideal" would be to have separate live and control rooms - but I'm well aware that that isn't always possible in a home studio.

I'd focus the treatment/layout on the "mix" position and then see about some kind of decent PA speaker that I could have set up wider at the front of the room.

E.g.,

Start with figuring out the ideal listening position for the room. That's where your chair goes. Put the desk in front of it and the speakers on or in front of that based on minimizing SBIR (which will depend on how you're treating the front wall). Assuming you have traps in the front corners, I'd probably look into something like line-array/column PA speakers (mostly because of size) set up "too wide" either as far forward on the side wall or as far to the sides of the front wall as possible.

At least in my head, that would make the "band" speakers interfere with the "mixing" speakers the least. The band speakers might also sound more exciting/lively from being so close to a corner - not at all ideal if you want a neutral sound, but possibly more engaging for band practice.

The other good alternative would be to run the Fractal through an FRFR (or just another speaker) and let the rest of the band make their own sound. I've used an old set of KRK Rokits for that (and literally placed them in the room where I would put a guitar amp), and the hyped sound that makes them bad for mixing actually makes them pretty awesome for a relatively low-volume guitar monitor. The sound changes as you move around, but the same thing is true for stage wedges or actual guitar amps.

(ETA: Forgot a couple things. I'm kind of hesitant to make speaker recommendations - it's a really personal choice. For nearfields, I do like Neumann and Genelec, and on the more budget side, I still think the JBL LSRs win. I also really dislike Kali and Adam. But, you really do have to try them yourself. The room is a huge part of the equation, as well as what you want to hear. The other side of it is that headphones and IEMs have come such a long way in the last few years that if you can find a set that actually works for you and figure out a bunch of little details - correction, your preferred target curve, crossfeed, etc. - there's a decent choice in gear that sounds more accurate/neutral/revealing than just about any speakers in most rooms until you're talking about a 5-figure investment. It's nowhere near as simple as just putting on headphones, and I don't like any of the all-in-one packages like VSX, NX, etc.. But, that doesn't solve the problem of band sound. If you like the idea of working that way and are willing to put in the time to figure it out, it could mean that you only need "big" speakers for the band and when you want to shake the room and just use the headphones/IEMs for the actual "work".)



One approach would be to just not make any compromises for the sound on the other side of the room. You'll still hear the nearfields - you just won't get the volume or stereo image that you would from a more dedicated solution. But, you're not going to give correct stereo image to the whole band no matter what you do....so it really just depends on how loud the band plays and what the back of the room sounds like.



Agreed.
I currently run my FM3 through a EVPXM12-MP. Looking for better sound. Neumann's are well out of my budget. For Genelec, are the 8010 or 8020's good for a basement studio with distances no more than say 12 to 15 feet? Most of the Genelecs, like the Neumanns are WELL above my budget.
 
I currently run my FM3 through a EVPXM12-MP. Looking for better sound. Neumann's are well out of my budget. For Genelec, are the 8010 or 8020's good for a basement studio with distances no more than say 12 to 15 feet? Most of the Genelecs, like the Neumanns are WELL above my budget.

No idea. The smallest ones I've heard are the 8030s.

In that price range, I'd honestly suggest the LSRs. They're absolutely not the best speakers out there and they're not actually full range, but you can get a very decent 2.1 system for about the cost of a pair of 8020s. Assuming that you can buy somewhere with a good return policy...I think it's worth trying.

If you mostly want to play guitar at low-ish volumes (around 70-80 dB SPL-C), the hyped sound of Rokits (potentially with their sub) is around the same price range and does sound "exciting"...I just wouldn't mix on them. I will say that mine turn 20 this year and are still going strong, and I used them for DJ Booth monitors at house parties for years.

But, you've gotta just try stuff and see what you like if you mostly/entirely play for yourself, what translates to PA systems and live rigs if your priority is gigging, and what translates as widely as you can find if you mostly produce/mix.

We all hear a bit differently and want to hear different things to do what we need to do. Sadly, there's just not a shortcut for trying stuff and seeing what works for you. I really wish there was.
 
No idea. The smallest ones I've heard are the 8030s.

In that price range, I'd honestly suggest the LSRs. They're absolutely not the best speakers out there and they're not actually full range, but you can get a very decent 2.1 system for about the cost of a pair of 8020s. Assuming that you can buy somewhere with a good return policy...I think it's worth trying.

If you mostly want to play guitar at low-ish volumes (around 70-80 dB SPL-C), the hyped sound of Rokits (potentially with their sub) is around the same price range and does sound "exciting"...I just wouldn't mix on them. I will say that mine turn 20 this year and are still going strong, and I used them for DJ Booth monitors at house parties for years.

But, you've gotta just try stuff and see what you like if you mostly/entirely play for yourself, what translates to PA systems and live rigs if your priority is gigging, and what translates as widely as you can find if you mostly produce/mix.

We all hear a bit differently and want to hear different things to do what we need to do. Sadly, there's just not a shortcut for trying stuff and seeing what works for you. I really wish there was.
I looked for the LSR's but it said discontinued, except for the subwoofer. Any idea of what current product of theirs would be similar?
Agreed, experiencing sound is the best test of what works and what doesn't for an individual.
i don't really mix and record much, mostly just play.
 
I looked for the LSR's but it said discontinued, except for the subwoofer. Any idea of what current product of theirs would be similar?

Apparently they just dropped LSR from the name. They're the 30{5,6,8}p mk2.

i don't really mix and record much, mostly just play.

I would compare them and the similar Rokit setup in that situation. To my ears, the JBLs are more neutral, and the Rokis are either scooped or hyped, depending on how you describe it.

Both have their flaws (just like every other speaker in this price range...or the next few steps up), but that's what I'd be thinking about for what you want.

I really don't like Kali, Adam, Yamaha HS, Presonus, etc.. But, they're also rather popular....you very well my prefer them if you like a different sound than I do. That doesn't mean either of us is wrong, just that we prefer different things (and, consequently, probably shouldn't recommend things to each other if that's the case).
 
Apparently they just dropped LSR from the name. They're the 30{5,6,8}p mk2.



I would compare them and the similar Rokit setup in that situation. To my ears, the JBLs are more neutral, and the Rokis are either scooped or hyped, depending on how you describe it.

Both have their flaws (just like every other speaker in this price range...or the next few steps up), but that's what I'd be thinking about for what you want.

I really don't like Kali, Adam, Yamaha HS, Presonus, etc.. But, they're also rather popular....you very well my prefer them if you like a different sound than I do. That doesn't mean either of us is wrong, just that we prefer different things (and, consequently, probably shouldn't recommend things to each other if that's the case).
True about your last comment. But for me gathering information/opinions is helpful in identifying attributes of various products. Then it is up to me (or anyone in my position) to evaluate all of the gathered information and (hopefully!) make an educated decision.
 
Barefoot.
Genelec.
Adam.
I haven't looked closely at Barefoot or Adam, but as noted above, I looked at Genelec. The ones probably most suited for my needs seem to be close to $2k each. The 8010 and 8020's are within my budget, but I am not sure they would produce the sound needed/desired from my FM3.
I really don't want to go above $1500 for a pair. If there is a Barefoot or Adam model that you recommend, do let me know. As I just responded to marsonic, gathering information/opinions on what people like or dislike is helpful information for me to process to come up with a decision.
 
My recommendation is more formulaic: be firm in setting a budget, get the best you can afford, and if at all possible to arrange yourself a shootout with the plan to keep what you love and return what you do not.

I don't see these at Thomann
https://www.sweetwater.com/store/de...t03-6.5-inch-3-way-active-studio-monitor-pair
A bit above my budget, but not impossible are the Footprint3's. They seem really nice and made in the USA! Also, I like the meme box that allows for hi-fi listening, and also, if I am reading it correctly, for FRFR for my guitar and for a keyboard. The Kali's look good also, but Made in China.
 
A bit above my budget, but not impossible are the Footprint3's. They seem really nice and made in the USA! Also, I like the meme box that allows for hi-fi listening, and also, if I am reading it correctly, for FRFR for my guitar and for a keyboard. The Kali's look good also, but Made in China.
If you just don't want Chinese made stuff, i totally get that. I could go into more detail but might get this whole thread closed and don't want to do that.

But, I feel like i have to point out that there are some absolutely incredible things from the "chi-fi" world that are as good as or better than their western counterparts, and they aren't just clones.

Monitor DACs, headphone amps, and IEMs in particular... there are several that really are worth considering.
 
If you just don't want Chinese made stuff, i totally get that. I could go into more detail but might get this whole thread closed and don't want to do that.

But, I feel like i have to point out that there are some absolutely incredible things from the "chi-fi" world that are as good as or better than their western counterparts, and they aren't just clones.

Monitor DACs, headphone amps, and IEMs in particular... there are several that really are worth considering.
I agree that the China topic/issue is a deep hole probably best avoided. Hopefully I can state my objection to stuff from China without going to far down into that hole.
i don't necessarily think China/Asia music stuff is any better or worse than American or EU stuff, I just prefer to support American businesses as that is where I live. In fact, buying American I have experienced some real crap so that isn't a guarantee at all of quality.
I do have some stuff from China. For example, my EVPXM12-MP monitor is from China. Bad example though as I am unimpressed with it, and have had several quality issues.
As to guitars, I ordered a PRS DGT SE a while back. The build quality seemed quite good. I returned it because, to me, the pickups sounded really bad.
And being currently in the market for a keyboard, it is really, really difficult to find something not made in Asia/China. Maybe Nord, but the cost!!!
Anyway, I totally agree with you that stuff from China isn't inherently inferior.
 
Barefoot.
Genelec.
Adam.
Quite difficult to get to try Barefoot here in Italy, but I've read very nice reviews on them.

I've a bit of experience with genelecs, I've tried a couple of the smaller ones, and I was amazed by how good sounding they are despite the small size. That's why I'm longing for them. Never tried the Adam, but I will.

I have just one concern with genelecs: sometimes, they're too good sounding: everything through them sounds good, and while for listening that's awesome, sometimes for mixing not so much. For years I've mixed on a couple of old Tannoys: everything on them sounds awful, they're cruel (well, really high level productions sound good even there, but not so often), but when I can make a mix not suck there, well, they're good everywhere else :tearsofjoy: high value there lol
 
I have just one concern with genelecs: sometimes, they're too good sounding: everything through them sounds good, and while for listening that's awesome, sometimes for mixing not so much. For years I've mixed on a couple of old Tannoys: everything on them sounds awful, they're cruel (well, really high level productions sound good even there, but not so often), but when I can make a mix not suck there, well, they're good everywhere else :tearsofjoy: high value there lol

I've heard this kind of comment a number of times about different speakers, and I've honestly been wondering where it comes from.

It doesn't make sense to me that one set of speakers can flatter "everything". If a song is a little on the scooped side, a mid-forward set of speakers could flatter it. But a mid-forward song on the same system would be further outside of "normal". So, just in that example, how could one set of speakers flatter both songs?

Then, consider that kind of reasoning for every "broad" descriptor of a sound.

Like I said, I've heard this a lot, and I'm not calling you out in any way, ezellohar. I just don't understand it.

As another example, I've also heard other mastering engineers talking about how they don't like attended sessions because "everything sounds great in a mastering room because the system and room are so good"...and others because "everything sounds bad in a mastering room because it's like listening with a microscope". Others have said that monitors need to be "unforgiving" above all else.

All of the specific people I'm talking about are very talented engineers - I wouldn't insult any of their abilities. But, they talk about their monitors very, very differently....and vaguely.

I assume the answer is "different strokes..." combined with people not really being able to (or wanting to) discuss all the technical things that separate good monitors from bad. And, at the end of the day, if you're using something that plays what you need to hear and lets your work translate to the widest possible playback scenarios, then they're the right monitors for you.

For me, good monitoring comes down to about 6 things: frequency response accuracy relative to my preferred target curves, low noise, low distortion, short decay time, well-controlled modes/resonances, and (for speakers) controlled directivity. Those things can all be measured and proven, at least after you figure out which target curve(s) you like. It's much harder (almost impossible) to accurately measure decay/resonance in Headphones and especially IEMs since they're more directly affected by your anatomy (hence, why preferences in them can be so much more varied).

I've been asking for years, but if anybody can actually explain words like "flattering" and "unforgiving" in this context, I'd be forever grateful. I'm honestly not convinced I've ever heard either, and I've listened to some incredibly nice and expensive systems from both the studio and hi-fi worlds.
 
Back
Top Bottom