BigD1977
Power User
And in addition to jimfist's comment, I would have thought that a mod should have slightly more impartiality than to rubber stamp a comment which has been designed to be confrontational.
Before this turns into a TGP type thread and adds fuel to those wanting to label Ax users "fanatics" maybe take a minute before hitting the reply button guys..
Take Care!
And in addition to jimfist's comment, I would have thought that a mod should have slightly more impartiality than to rubber stamp a comment which has been designed to be confrontational.
yesWhatever people think about the Kemper. One fact is is sure: There was no competition to to the AxeFX before. Now, finally there is a competition (alternative choice), even though both are different devices with different aproaches for different musicians. That's great. It will bring more life into the market of professional modellers.
If all you need are one amp/cab/mic block at once then yes.The other good part is the price. Along with a Midi Board (CC capable - Behringer with mod) it is much more affordable.
Only the amps/cabs/mics - and then you have a static profile - while on the AxeFx you can tweak hundreds of amp,cab and mic parametersAnd it can make profiles of the AxeFx
Before this turns into a TGP type thread and adds fuel to those wanting to label Ax users "fanatics" maybe take a minute before hitting the reply button guys..
Take Care!
As I recall, he never stated in this thread that the AFX couldn't do blues or blues rock tones, rather, that HE never 'got to the right sound out of it', and has found a tool for him which will.
Saying that the unit didn't do it's thing for him could hardly be called an 'incorrect assertion'.
What is wrong with stating this, apart from stating his point of view?
Some people just don't like the unit, and should be allowed to say so without a condescending tone in reply.
Secondly, if the AFX 1 didn't do the job for him, why should he fork out additional money for an AFX II, when he seems perfectly happy with a KPA?
The only objectionable part of the whole thread has come from you, jimfist, in your reply, and in what appears to be a slightly OCD tendency to research and patronise those who would express an opinion that is contrary to yours.
Only the amps/cabs/mics - and then you have a static profile - while on the AxeFx you can tweak hundreds of amp,cab and mic parameters
I plan on using the Axe (when it gets here) for direct recording not for live gigs, although not ruling it out. So the Kemper isn't really on my radar.
The AxeFx II is my dream machine - almost all seams to be possible - I am NOT limited to profiles of real amps since I can manipulate all important parameters of a real tube amp (in the amp block's advanced settings).
So I can create sounds none existent in the real world - or replicate sounds of real amps.
Yes, to EXACTLY replicate the sounds of a real amp/cab/mic is more complicated with the AxeFx but possible - almost all existing basic circuits of tube amps are available as amp models - there are a lot of CAB models as well - with the option to capture any existing real cabinet/mic with the new IR capture feature.
But this is only one part of the AxeFx fun - the other is to create NEW stuff - and this is not (or only in a very limited way) possible with the Kemper.
The third point is effects - I don't want to compare some basic effects in a static row (4 effects - amp,cab,mic - 4 other effects) with the large AxeFx 4*12 effect matrix.
And I would need two Kemper's to get the sound of two amps at once