Wish Individually addressable L/R input output blocks

[zenaxe]

I know you can work around this somewhat by hard panning signals in the mixer but it’d be nice and much more flexible to have additional ‘mono’ blocks for Input 1L/1R/2L/2R/etc and Output 1L/1R/2L/2R/etc I am using my AxeFX III as an FX processor with multiple preamps and, in effect, I only have two stereo loops at my disposal (3+4; 1 and 2 are doing other I/O) but I actually need four mono loops for my rig.

The Axe has the I/O to do it, so it seems like this would just be a software only upgrade.

 

[Rex]

I know you can work around this somewhat by hard panning signals in the mixer but it’d be nice and much more flexible to have additional ‘mono’ blocks for Input 1L/1R/2L/2R/etc and Output 1L/1R/2L/2R/etc I am using my AxeFX III as an FX processor with multiple preamps and, in effect, I only have two stereo loops at my disposal (3+4; 1 and 2 are doing other I/O) but I actually need four mono loops for my rig.

The Axe has the I/O to do it, so it seems like this would just be a software only upgrade.

Actually, there a full workaround for this, with judicious use of balance and panning in various blocks. But fully-separable left and right would be more elegant.

 

[zenaxe]

Actually, there a full workaround for this, with judicious use of balance and panning in various blocks. But fully-separable left and right would be more elegant.

Yeah, exactly. I knew you could do that and it is a viable work around; but separated blocks would make presets so much more clear/maintainable.

 

[peteri]

Another vote for this.

It would effectively double the loops available. Since right now output 2 / input 2 (for example) can only be on the grid once.

So you lose a stereo pair for a mono pedal

 

[lqdsnddist]

Would be especially useful on the FM3….

 

[Rex]

Another vote for this.

It would effectively double the loops available. Since right now output 2 / input 2 (for example) can only be on the grid once.

So you lose a stereo pair for a mono pedal

Actually, there is a full workaround for this, with judicious use of balance and panning in various blocks. But fully-separable left and right would be more elegant.

 

[zenaxe]

Would be especially useful on the FM3….

Yes, for sure. @FractalAudio

 

[musicalou]

+1

Will be easier to manage fully-separable left and right.

 

[Radix Lecti]

+1

 

[zenaxe]

Bump.

 

[fabien251]

+1

 

[winn3r]

+1 for this too!

Is there a thread explaining the recommended workaround? I've figured out how to split a stereo output into parallel dual mono, for example:
Out3 pan L -> ext mono delay -> In3 L
Out3 pan R -> ext mono reverb -> In3 R
(delay and reverb are applied together here)

But is there currently a way to connect them in series?
Out3 L -> ext mono delay -> In3 L -> some other internal fx blocks -> Out3 R -> ext mono reverb -> in3 R

 

[sprint]

But is there currently a way to connect them in series?
Out3 L -> ext mono delay -> In3 L -> some other internal fx blocks -> Out3 R -> ext mono reverb -> in3 R

Not that know of - would be cool to have (I've found the capability useful in HX Stomp).

 

[JTI]

+ 1 billion

 

[WKSmith]

This is the only reason that I also have an HX stomp on my board... To manage two loops for analog drives in front of a tube amp.