Fabian Rainville
Inspired
My cover band has two singers, what would be industry standard as far as a percentage of the take?
I get that. Hard to justify an equal pay when not everyone is contributing equallyI play in 2 bands a cover band and an original jazz trio.
The cover band was well established before I ever joined it. The people in the band are amazing folks. I consider every one of them a close friend. They offered me an equal share when I joined - even thought they didn't have to. They make decent money too - weddings, corporate parties, etc. They had already built the band's brand long before I joined so they could have been justified offering me less. They didn't know it at the time, but I donate all my income back to the band. I don't need it, but others in the band do. Plus it would be a pain in the ass tax wise for me - so easier to collect $0.
In the Jazz trio I "write" all the music and I still "pay" my mates equal for every gig. Once I bring in a tune their participation adds so much and ends up having a major influence on the final result. In this band none of us needs the income (we are all professionals in other fields). So we agreed early on to donate all our proceeds to music education in public schools and local public jazz radio.
From my youth, once anyone in the band gets greedy, or says I deserve more than you, the experience sucks and quickly becomes toxic for all.
I get that. Hard to justify an equal pay when not everyone is contributing equally
What do you mean? Can you expound a bit?I get that. Hard to justify an equal pay when not everyone is contributing equally
The bigger the ego, the less amount of money.
Someone has to cut them down to this atmosphere. Sheesh.That is the perfect formula since they are usually the biggest douchebags.
Someone has to cut them down to this atmosphere. Sheesh.
It’s been my experience the less talent, the bigger the ego. Amazing singers I’ve worked with were such a pleasure and down to earth. I have a guy who sings in the key of potato that is intolerable. He will very soon be gone.In my experience it is usually the front man/men that suck the worst. Interestingly (also in my experience) this does not hold true for female front persons. They have always been wonderful to work with for me.
Maybe because there is no phallic compensation going on? Just a guess.
It’s been my experience the less talent, the bigger the ego. Amazing singers I’ve worked with were such a pleasure and down to earth. I have a guy who sings in the key of potato that is intolerable. He will very soon be gone.
That is the perfect formula since they are usually the biggest douchebags.
What do you mean? Can you expound a bit?
This is my situationFor sure! I have also noticed an exception to the rule that if a front person (male or female) also plays an instrument the douchebag rule does not apply.
I also worked with a male singer back in the 90s, he played no instrument but he had a tremendous amount of singing talent and he knew it. He was insufferable. But we put up with him because he was so good.
But I think your point is the more common case. The best musicians I know are all very humble about their talent.
This is my situation
But you were playing on every song and helping move equipment/ sharing ownership of equipment I assumeOn of the bands I was in , I was 2nd guitar and 1/2 the lead vocals. The other guitar player\lead singer was just amazing singing and playing-did he get extra $$$-Nope. Guess I am old school too but was always equal pay if you were a member the band-period.