I'm a completely satisfied Ultra owner. But all this speculation about the HD500 has me wondering. Someone mentioned a fictional "dual DSP" Axe. This has me wondering, how much better can the Axe get?
I got my Axe recently, my experience is with FW 9.03, and 10.01. Honestly, I can't imagine how the amp modeling could sound much better. But suppose it can. In what ways could it be improved? In what way is the amp modeling limited now? Are the algorithms CPU limited now?
Suppose there was a "dual Ultra". One DSP for amp modeling, one for FX. Would it actually be a quantum leap over the 10.01 Ultra, or just an incremental improvement?
More realistically, what if Cliff developed Ultra specific amp models that could take advantage of the extra CPU, perhaps at the expense of the number of concurrent fx. Would it be a noticeable improvement?
Just curious ...
JWW
I got my Axe recently, my experience is with FW 9.03, and 10.01. Honestly, I can't imagine how the amp modeling could sound much better. But suppose it can. In what ways could it be improved? In what way is the amp modeling limited now? Are the algorithms CPU limited now?
Suppose there was a "dual Ultra". One DSP for amp modeling, one for FX. Would it actually be a quantum leap over the 10.01 Ultra, or just an incremental improvement?
More realistically, what if Cliff developed Ultra specific amp models that could take advantage of the extra CPU, perhaps at the expense of the number of concurrent fx. Would it be a noticeable improvement?
Just curious ...
JWW