D
Deleted member 75605
Guest
I think used PRS is smarter as well. You can look on The Gear Page forum for some pretty stellar deals to avoid crazy price hikes.
I love the s2 series guitars particularly the satin finish guitars which were my first experience with PRS - but I had a DGT for a minute and liked everything about it (glorious neck - everywhere the pattern regular felt "wrong" it felt "right") but I'm not a flame-lover so it had to go because I hated the look (please don't @ me). The pattern regular neck to me feels like the slim 1960s gibson neck if it were made by fender and it really gels with me. I've never played the 'pattern thin' because I thought the regular felt pretty thin (I know it's only a little thinner). The pattern vintage neck feels so close to a 1960s slim taper but I found it more comfortable, of course, YMMV.
PS - I was in after wide fat/wide thin/etc so I have no idea about those necks or the naming conventions/changes.
I love the s2 series guitars particularly the satin finish guitars which were my first experience with PRS - but I had a DGT for a minute and liked everything about it (glorious neck - everywhere the pattern regular felt "wrong" it felt "right") but I'm not a flame-lover so it had to go because I hated the look (please don't @ me). The pattern regular neck to me feels like the slim 1960s gibson neck if it were made by fender and it really gels with me. I've never played the 'pattern thin' because I thought the regular felt pretty thin (I know it's only a little thinner). The pattern vintage neck feels so close to a 1960s slim taper but I found it more comfortable, of course, YMMV.
PS - I was in after wide fat/wide thin/etc so I have no idea about those necks or the naming conventions/changes.
Last edited by a moderator: