I'd be curious to see what people are using the Axe-FX II for, for example live use or only for bedroom playing, etc.
I just wonder if folks like the amp/cab thing because it works better for gigs or if they like having that pushed air at home as well.
I've done both amp and cab and FR for a live gig though not with the Axe ll and it really depends on the stage application. If you need to keep SPL at a minimum a wedge at your feet really works the best but if your trying to carry the house and stage some prefer amp and cab but one could use both. As to bedroom warriors personal preference is a bitch...:lol
I have never heard the Axe-FX II thru FRFR, etc. so I don't know if I would like it better or worse than my setup. I'll still keep my cabs for the future regardless. I have been thinking about getting a better power amp but then wonder if two KRK monitors would be fine for my home use. So many choices.
When you play through a cab all your presets are heard through that prism, with FRFR you can use many virtual cabinets to have a more tonal options. Since the Axe is about options, restricting them seems counterproductive.
You leave one important option out....speaker sims does not give you the option to play through a cabinet. It only gives you the option to play through recordings of cabinets. Quite different.
I disagree.
The purpose of buying the Axe, for myself and many others, is the ability to mimic many different amplifier and cabinet combinations. The IRs heard through a FRFR sound the same as you would sound through the PA at any venue. You are trying to make the argument that there is this vast difference between what the musician on the stage hears versus the audience, but I do not find that to be true at all.