Drive Block In Parallel Causes Phase Issues

[clarky]

thinking about it… the delay is really small..
if I understand this correctly, the OP has something like this:
drive1 -> amp1 -> cab1
shunt -> amp2 -> cab2

if this is the case, then maybe using the delay in cab2 could fix this without incurring the extra cpu hit / tonal coloration you'd get by adding an additional comp or drive block

EDIT: ahh.. just noticed that Java has already suggested this..

 

[SeeD]

noted !

 

[Moke]

Even the 'null' clipping type in the drive block affects the tone so there must be some filtering going on even when levels are at zero.

Did you check the 'Low Cut' and 'High Cut' settings??

 

[SeeD]

So,help a brother out

I need 2 rows..right ?
Row 2 . DI....(Tube Pre ?)
Row 3 . Is a.. Comp (lookahead 0,069 ..Drive (or amp) ?

 

[muleskinner]

If you have a drive block in parallel the row(s) without the drive block need the compressor to compensate for latency.

When I say 'need' I just speak from experience and am mainly referring to bass tones on which the phasing issue is more obvious to my ears. Of course YMMV.

Would be nice to have a 'true' mix control in the drive block

 

[SeeD]

Would someone mind,sharing a nice preset ?

I have a Mark 1