Regarding this thread, I still think he isn't talking about DI boxes only.
Correct. I've written this before and two other people understood and answered.
I think he is referring to DI as direct injection to a recording system or Mixer, and his question is "what is best, using or not using a box that is also known as a DI."
Correct. "Can someone please provide the latest best practices? DI box or not? Hookup suggestions etc."
This was my first post. Did you really not understand that line and feel the need to rewrite my first post as, "what is best, using or not using a box that is also known as a DI.?"
Opinions from people who have used and continue to use or have stopped using DI boxes is what is desired and its been difficult to find discussions regarding that specific topic.
Thanks Chris for condescendingly rewriting my initial post(s) which other people understood and have answered from their "best practices" when using DI, DI Box, DI Unit, or not using anything at all.
Would you like to hijack this thread and argue if Low Pass Filter should be called High Cut Filter? We can, but can you PM me instead as I'm trying to get more info about DI, DI Box, DI Unit or no DI when using the AXE FX whether for live or in the studio use.
Note: You should take some time and read how Scott Peterson and Trazan reply to people here. There's lot you can learn about tone and "your way".
Now back to DI/Reamp talk.
For example: Attached screenshots using no DI box. This is an old example (+6db. Before the Out 2 mod) hence why I made the original post.
PIC 1 = DI/reamp+mono.jpg: dry signal and mono amp signal (mono) on OUT1 (and SPDIF) (-> dry right, with amp left)
PIC 2 = DI/reamp+stereo.jpg: dry signal on OUT2 (just record ONE signal mono) and stereo Amped signal on OUT1 (and SPDIF)