ok, cool.I was wrong the first time. Of course I don't know why he did it.
ok, cool.I was wrong the first time. Of course I don't know why he did it.
I personally would prefer discussing things like can we get a switch that would toggle economy/high quality mode where users could explicitly opt to decrease oversampling to run more amp instances. For example.
pretty sure adding a 2nd amp block won't affect CPU much at all. try it.I've hit the CPU limit using only one amp block so I won't likely be using two amp blocks, much less three.
I believe if we worked together and used our superpowers for good and not evil, we could write some seriously great music
my comment just continues the discussion... but some people still feel the gap renders channel switching completely unusable. i don't think that personally. but some do. that is why many are pushing for more amp blocks.The gap is claimed to be virtually non existant in Axe FX 3. So it's really not worth doing that "Switch between blocks" trick to avoid the audio gap.
I used to think that the gap made the X/Y switching unusable.my comment just continues the discussion... but some people still feel the gap renders channel switching completely unusable. i don't think that personally. but some do. that is why many are pushing for more amp blocks.
we can all have our own opinions. but some expectations are a bit outside of reality.
the struggle between what people think is easy to accomplish and not knowing how difficult it actually is to accomplish those things is the main reason for this dissonance among users.
some of us speak from experience, and the creator even chimes in, yet certain things still "should be easy to do." *shrug* it's tough.
same here. that said, from the years of using real amps, i've gotten used to changing slightly before i need it and rarely holding a note across a tone/channel change.I used to think that the gap made the X/Y switching unusable.
But it's really just bigger when USB is connected.
When it's done via midi, it seems to be smaller? Well, it's not so big that would bother me.
Wouldn't record with it, but during live I don't notice it most of the time...
Could you have it automate the change a 16th note earlier? Or similar?Whether the gap is noticeable or not of course depends on what you’re playing. When you need one tone to flow into another it’s hard not to notice it, IMO.
Then it’s more noticeable when using IEMs.
And also, for me it’s more noticeable when scene switching is automated (which is something I do a lot). When you step on a switch yourself, it’s probably subconsciously expected to have something to disrupt audio, when things change “by themselves” it just feels like something is wrong.
Once it started bothering me, it’s impossible to “unhear”.
I wouldn't want the quality of the amp block to be less just so we could use 3 amps blocks
Could you have it automate the change a 16th note earlier? Or similar?
this isn't a challenge at all, please believe me. but if you have the capability to record any example of what you're playing and the Scene/whatever changes, i'm just curious to hear what it sounds like. it's in effort to improve the gear. i know what a scene change sounds like, for sure. but it'd be cool to hear someone else's context.I tried that, doesn’t help. When there’s a lot of short delay and/or reverb it’s not that bad but when the sound is dry it’s noticeable.
What I’m doing is using two amp blocks in parallel without channel switching, and modifying sound for solos by PEQ and drive blocks.
this isn't a challenge at all, please believe me. but if you have the capability to record any example of what you're playing and the Scene/whatever changes, i'm just curious to hear what it sounds like. it's in effort to improve the gear. i know what a scene change sounds like, for sure. but it'd be cool to hear someone else's context.
ok cool, just curious.I won’t be near my Axe-FX until March 17 at least, I’m on a trip now. There’s nothing specific about my presets though, or the sequences of scenes, it’s about how I perceive that while playing through IEMs.
I just ordered my Axe FX II.
At the moment it seems I cannot yet:
- run simultaneously bass amp + guitar amp 1 + guitar amp 2 (3 simultaneous amps)
- provide true random LFO driving delay for guitar amp 2 to simulate double tracking
Is a single Amp block true stereo processing?