fetishfrog
Inspired
Interesting point of view, Fetishfrog.
Did you give any consideration to the supplement companies shareholders and other stakeholders that may feel differently about their customer base dying or getting sick from product use and the stigma associated with that situation?
Would you care to share which companies are excluded from your sweeping generalization?
In rereading my post, I realize I implied something I did not mean to. I didn't mean to suggest these companies didn't care about their consumers. I did mean to suggest they all care about quarterly profits. My wording was wonky and misleading.
I do think, given the lack of regulation in the supplement industry, the long term impacts of supplements is poorly studied and understood. Since there is no regulatory requirement to do so, companies typically don't.
One exception I've seen is creatine, which has myriad peer reviewed studies.
All that said, we've seen a number of notable examples in other industries where people have chosen profits over the long term health of their consumers.
The pharmaceutical industry famously has Oxycontin and Celebrex from the recent past, and they are insanely heavily regulated. The auto industry has never chomped at the bit to implement much of anything without being forced by regulation. Seatbelts, airbags, emmissions controls, crash crumple engineering all came at the hands of regulation and all save lives. I mean, the whole point of this topic is that protein supplements were found to have high concentrations of lead, especially the plant based proteins, and you can guarantee the plant based protein supplements were marketed as healthy and in some cases, healthier than animal based supplements. Whoops.
So I remain a bit skeptical.




