giantslayer
Experienced
Here's some stuff
That JTM45 in there... I'm gonna have to try that out. A year or two ago, the Dirty Shirley beat out the JTM45 when I was comparing them, but it may be time for a rematch...
Here's some stuff
Here's some stuff
Probably because you're listening critically through monitors, or at least I am. You would hear it as 'texture' in a song context or depending where you stand in the room with a real cabinet. Kind of like snare drum rattle.Yep they are “dirty/fuzzy” for what I’ve heard but these artefacts in the axe just jump more in my face.
I figured it out. I had the tape preamp 70 selected instead of 35. It is considerably darker. Not sure how that happened. I agree, now it sounds way more clear and balanced proper. Even my pretend acoustic patch sounds better. (Tube Preamp amp model)I'm experiencing the opposite. Lots more clarity in the high end.
^^thank you sir... this sounds out of this world awesome, I love your brain
Maybe, but it's not about mimic the sound, more about the details (hearable during the last part).......Lots of room sound in this one. Need a good full-res IR to go for that sound.
I have a similar set up as yours - matrix into Zilla 2×12 and have to cut the high end quite drastically when I turn up to gig volumes. I do this via the global eqAfter reading all the comments. I think people mostly use monitors or FRFR,
I haven't updated to the new beta yet, but all my presets have a filter cut on 100 and 8100 Hz.
My signal chain is -Guitar -Axe FX III -Matrix -2x (2x12 V30s Mesa)
might be a dumb question but... Was I doing it wrong since I have real cabs?
I really feel a big difference with the filter block engaged.
if you tweak the hell out of it, then heaven opens.I don't know what the hell you did... I'm playing with the Plexi 50W 6CA7 and I think I reached amp heaven
Here's some stuff
The B-H curve is essentially the inductance of a transformer vs. applied magnetic force. A transformer is a very nonlinear device. At very low and very high flux intensity the inductance is less than at nominal. Furthermore the curve has hysteresis so the inductance decreases when the flux changes direction.
Yeah, I saw that "interview". There are literally hundreds of papers on modeling transformer behavior. The most common techniques are the Frohlich and Jiles-Atherton models. I have my own algorithm that's more CPU efficient.Now I simply don’t believe this; the owner of a newer modeling ”competitor” recently did an interview where he stated no one knows how transformers work because no one took the time to study them. He found themselves in the fortunate position of not needing to understand them since machine learning did it for them.
Cough cough Howard Tremaine would like a word with this gentleman...no one knows how transformers work because no one took the time to study them
interested, I just read the article - damn, I'd like te have me one a them there NNet thingys te figur out mi taxes fur me.Now I simply don’t believe this; the owner of a newer modeling ”competitor” recently did an interview where he stated no one knows how transformers work because no one took the time to study them. He found themselves in the fortunate position of not needing to understand them since machine learning did it for them.