DLC86
Fractal Fanatic
I remember that on the ax8, when you loaded an IR without the ultrares processing, it was saved as what was called a high-res IR (aka 2048 samples) and the cpu usage of the cab block didn't change when changing between normal res (1024 samples) and high/ultra-res (2048 samples) since it was running on the accelerator, so we could have double the length without taxing the cpu.
The axe fx III works pretty much the same way, loading an IR in standard res but selecting maximum IR lenght in the cab block gives you a 2048 samples IR (even though, in this case the CPU usage is higher since the axe doesn't have a dedicated accelerator and the convolution runs on the main cpu core).
On the fm9 otoh (and I suppose on the fm3 too), by loading a standard res IR you can only get a 1024 samples IR, no matter if the cab block is set to standard res or ultrares.
Could we have the same implementation as the axe 3 and ax8 please? Unless it's a hardware limitation of course (which seems unlikely to me since fm9/3 chips are basically new generation of the chips found in the ax8.. but who knows)
The axe fx III works pretty much the same way, loading an IR in standard res but selecting maximum IR lenght in the cab block gives you a 2048 samples IR (even though, in this case the CPU usage is higher since the axe doesn't have a dedicated accelerator and the convolution runs on the main cpu core).
On the fm9 otoh (and I suppose on the fm3 too), by loading a standard res IR you can only get a 1024 samples IR, no matter if the cab block is set to standard res or ultrares.
Could we have the same implementation as the axe 3 and ax8 please? Unless it's a hardware limitation of course (which seems unlikely to me since fm9/3 chips are basically new generation of the chips found in the ax8.. but who knows)
Last edited: