rushfan
Power User
This is a Poll (I forgot to put that in the title!). So please also cast a vote above!
In a discussion with a sound engineer, he prefers to NOT EQ the main PA for different rooms or outdoors, and prefers to do the parametric EQ sweeps of each channel during soundcheck to set each channel, leaving the main PA EQ off.
I believe one should tune the PA for each room, say, with some familiar program material, and then adjust the EQ on the channels to taste, if need be, especially since the channel EQ also affects the monitors. (A large 2K boost on my Axe FX channel one night made my guitar so uninspiring to play, and I found it to be exceedingly bright and brittle. It really was hard to play)
I’m not saying I am right and he is wrong, these are just 2 different schools of thought, but I believe it is easier to tune the main PA EQ, and the channel EQ will be fairly consistent from room to room to outdoors.
In a discussion with a sound engineer, he prefers to NOT EQ the main PA for different rooms or outdoors, and prefers to do the parametric EQ sweeps of each channel during soundcheck to set each channel, leaving the main PA EQ off.
I believe one should tune the PA for each room, say, with some familiar program material, and then adjust the EQ on the channels to taste, if need be, especially since the channel EQ also affects the monitors. (A large 2K boost on my Axe FX channel one night made my guitar so uninspiring to play, and I found it to be exceedingly bright and brittle. It really was hard to play)
I’m not saying I am right and he is wrong, these are just 2 different schools of thought, but I believe it is easier to tune the main PA EQ, and the channel EQ will be fairly consistent from room to room to outdoors.
Last edited: