wesleyamltd
Inspired
The recent update is very impressive and it makes me wonder if fuel amp blocks are indeed possible.
There simply isn't enough CPU available to run two amp blocks on the FM3.
But they’re wizards!!! (said in a snarky but playful tone)This has been asked before in a previous thread. Here’s the response.
If you don’t need dual amp blocks simultaneously you basically now have the equivalent of 4 per preset with gapless channelsBut they’re wizards!!!
Wizards have standards.But they’re wizards!!!
Wizards have standards.
Have you actually tried it? With 2 parallel amps you can create some tones you can't get with a single amp...I'd be curious why anyone needs two different amps simultaneously. Two separate cabs + gain pedals + gapless switching/channels covers a lot of ground.
If dual amps are your thing, wouldn't you just buy an FM9? I think the FM3 is geared for us that use simple rigs!!
"dual"... Not "duel" or "fuel"
Phasing issues are realConsider getting an amp in the box pedal if you really need to combine sounds.
I had a live stereo rig with a 65 Amps London Pro and Brunetti Pleximan into a stereo 2x12 cab. Big, bold clean on one amp, edge of breakup on the other, great tones with that rig. The different amps helped widen the stereo image.I'd be curious why anyone needs two different amps simultaneously. Two separate cabs + gain pedals + gapless switching/channels covers a lot of ground.
That said, 10+ years ago I had a pedalboard with 5-6 Wampler pedals. Black 65, Tweed, Plexi, Brown Sound, Vox... etc. Consider getting an amp in the box pedal if you really need to combine sounds.
Sean Meredith-Jones