Yikes! We switched to in-ears, and the in-ears we're using sound horrible...

I purchased the 6 driver version of these. Been really pleased with them. They mold the unit to your ears so they fit very comfortably. You use an app on your phone to scan your ears. They come with multiple different tips to ensure you get a good seal. I use the clear thermo plastic tips that come with it. Granted as a guitarist I didn’t need 6 drivers but my recall is based on all the components of the song so I wanted to hear everything clearly. They had a coupon going at the time that gave a 25% discount.

https://wavscustom.com/products/custom-fit-in-ear-monitors?variant=51706386088210
Heh. I'm surprised you like how they sound, but that's all that I will say. As long as YOU like them, that's all that matters.
 
Heh. I'm surprised you like how they sound, but that's all that I will say. As long as YOU like them, that's all that matters.
Not sure which version you tried but the 6 driver ones have good clarity and a good seal in my ears so I get decent bass response. Of course, what I have to compare them to are cheap Linsoul KZ IEMs which sound like crap and hurt my ears after 5 min of use and my Westone UM Pro 30 IEMs. The Wavs were a huge improvement over KZ and UM Pro 30.
 
Donald Trump GIF by reactionseditor


There are tons of options that are a fraction of the cost of an FM9...

I've gone the expensive custom in ear route, and then also the low/mid/high end universal route. I would recommend universal over custom every time. My $170 set of universals sound way better than the $1500 customs. The tuning in the custom IEM market leaves a LOT to be desired.

Check frequency response before you buy!
There was a bit of humorous exaggeration in my statement.
That's why I used the smiley. Everyone should use what they want.
But I've tried a lot of things. And especially when you're playing on big, loud stages, I think the earphones need to be adjusted to fit your ears.
Otherwise, in-ear monitors are counterproductive and can even damage your hearing. Another point, especially when playing longer musicals, is the issue of ear fatigue.

After a long search, I purchased the 64Audio18t. It's a dream.
Together with our IEM system consisting of a Behringer WING rack, Midas hub, and Midas DP48, the sound is truly incredible.
The absolute dream would of course be the KLANG system, but unfortunately that would cost another five digits and the entire system would then have to be built on a DANTE NETWORK.
 
I've been perfectly happy with my Shure PSM 300 and SE425 buds. For me they fit well and are comfortable for long gigs. Of course under clinical conditions isolating the guitar I can hear the imperfections, but by the time I have an on stage mix the results are very good.
 
I've been perfectly happy with my Shure PSM 300 and SE425 buds. For me they fit well and are comfortable for long gigs. Of course under clinical conditions isolating the guitar I can hear the imperfections, but by the time I have an on stage mix the results are very good.
I have similar but the 535 and 846. Never really had an issue. Also do own monitoring from Allen and Heath app so I can EQ and compress etc to my requirements.
 
We use the Behringer XAir-18 with individual P16’s. Once we set our mix in the P16 it goes in the rack to feed the wireless transmitter. The drummer keeps his P16 at his kit and plugs his IEM in directly.

If we use a feed from FOH/Monitor World I bring my tablet and just mix that in the XAir.

I find that FOH engineers really like the fact that we bring our own monitor rig, it makes their job easier for sure.
 
Last edited:
We use the Behringer XAir-18 with individual P16’s. Once we set our mix in the P16 it goes in the rack to feed the wireless transmitter. The drummer keeps his P16 at his kit and plugs his IEM in directly.

If we use a feed from FOH/Monitor World I bring my tablet and just mix that in the XAir.

I find that FOH engineers really like the fact that we bring our our monitor rig, it makes their job easier for sure.
That is exactly how we do it (even using XAir-18 :)) using a split snake. Although we use the monitor set up for practice also and there is hardly ever anything that needs any adjustment since it is the same monitor mix we use all the time.
 
...the KZ ZS10 Pros with the Comply memory foam tips are surprisingly very good sounding...
Hi Domct203,
can you tell me the exact model of Comply you use? I looked at their website and there are tons of models.
I also got the KZ Zs and I want to try them...
Thank you
 
There was a bit of humorous exaggeration in my statement.
That's why I used the smiley. Everyone should use what they want.
But I've tried a lot of things. And especially when you're playing on big, loud stages, I think the earphones need to be adjusted to fit your ears.
Otherwise, in-ear monitors are counterproductive and can even damage your hearing. Another point, especially when playing longer musicals, is the issue of ear fatigue.

After a long search, I purchased the 64Audio18t. It's a dream.
Together with our IEM system consisting of a Behringer WING rack, Midas hub, and Midas DP48, the sound is truly incredible.
The absolute dream would of course be the KLANG system, but unfortunately that would cost another five digits and the entire system would then have to be built on a DANTE NETWORK.

What are you using to drive the A18t’s? They are very source sensitive from what I’ve read.
 
I’ve tried SE425s and several of the multi driver KZ buds. I finally ended up getting a pair of SE846s. They are the bomb for me

I approach IEM use a little differently than most folks on stage (my band is silent stage except for drums). For me, sound leakage is a good thing and I get a lot of sound from the mains. I use the leakage and augment that with my monitor mix. Works well for me

I also use my 846s at home straight out of the headphone jack. I learn material from YouTube recordings and use those as a reference for my own tones - gives me an idea of how it sounds in a mix.

I also keep the level in my buds low at home. It correlates well when kept low in my buds
 
Not sure which version you tried but the 6 driver ones have good clarity and a good seal in my ears so I get decent bass response. Of course, what I have to compare them to are cheap Linsoul KZ IEMs which sound like crap and hurt my ears after 5 min of use and my Westone UM Pro 30 IEMs. The Wavs were a huge improvement over KZ and UM Pro 30.
I think I got the 5 driver set. I remember trying to pick the "top of the line" one, which is probably the 6-driver one, but the owner said he didn't recommend it and that the 5 driver one actually sounded better. In the end, my Westone UM30 Pro and UM50 Pro sound MUCH better to me. I have other friends that also got the Wavs and were disappointed as well. I keep them around as backups and use them for podcast interviews and such.

I see a lot of good things about the Soundbrenner Waves for $99, but I don't have a reason to buy a set since I'm satisfied with my Westones, although I've had reliability issues with them over the years. We only use our IEMs for rehearsals and half our shows anyways.
 
I find that FOH engineers really like the fact that we bring our own monitor rig, it makes their job easier for sure.
In my experience, this is true 99% of the time when you're the only band playing a 3-hour set, or even one of 2 bands playing 90 minute sets.

When you're playing 30-minute sets with 3-4 bands, I've had a huge range of experiences with engineers. It's usually mostly driven by the setup at the venue. I've basically settled that if it's a small show, we just run cabs and wedges, especially if we're not headlining. We just pick what makes the most sense for each show.

With the bigger shows, I have to go in being flexible if we're not headlining. I've had one engineer get PISSED when I asked if we could use our IEM rig, but when I was totally flexible and willing to use HIS split instead of ours, it worked out well and he ended up really enjoying working with us and kept chatting with me about sound stuff. Another show, the headliner took up all the sound check time so we only had 10 minutes to get 3 bands' gear on stage so IEMs were out of question. But then, we played a show with much bigger bands and the sound engineer was super thankful we had IEMs because the stage was shallow and didn't even have room with wedges with 3 kits on the stage. And many experiences where it's just a non-issue with a crew that knows what they're doing.

So yeah, those are some anecdotal experiences that no one asked for, but there ya go.
 
In my experience, this is true 99% of the time when you're the only band playing a 3-hour set, or even one of 2 bands playing 90 minute sets.

When you're playing 30-minute sets with 3-4 bands, I've had a huge range of experiences with engineers. It's usually mostly driven by the setup at the venue. I've basically settled that if it's a small show, we just run cabs and wedges, especially if we're not headlining. We just pick what makes the most sense for each show.

With the bigger shows, I have to go in being flexible if we're not headlining. I've had one engineer get PISSED when I asked if we could use our IEM rig, but when I was totally flexible and willing to use HIS split instead of ours, it worked out well and he ended up really enjoying working with us and kept chatting with me about sound stuff. Another show, the headliner took up all the sound check time so we only had 10 minutes to get 3 bands' gear on stage so IEMs were out of question. But then, we played a show with much bigger bands and the sound engineer was super thankful we had IEMs because the stage was shallow and didn't even have room with wedges with 3 kits on the stage. And many experiences where it's just a non-issue with a crew that knows what they're doing.

So yeah, those are some anecdotal experiences that no one asked for, but there ya go.
I concur, if it’s a multi band showcase type thing we don’t bring the IEM rig.
 
My $1500 pedal sounds worse than a $49 pedal. Holy smokes. Tons of fiz, no tone at all. Like a horrible phone call. What tips might you give me?

I'm using a nice quality Audio-Technica ATW-3255 in-ear system with their in-ears. Dual drivers. The keyboard (Yamaha CK88 sounds like butt also. Same thing, a cheap, bad phone call.
First thing I think would be worth checking out would be what the board is feeding you, whether or not you’re getting a flat signal or not.
 
First thing I think would be worth checking out would be what the board is feeding you, whether or not you’re getting a flat signal or not.
That's a GREAT point. The old cover band I was in had a sound engineer we often worked with who went in and applied some curve with a bunch of sharp cuts that was supposed to help with clarity and separation for IEMs, but I much prefer to have a flat signal to get a good-sounding mix because it's more fun to play when it sounds good. I don't want to JUST hear myself and drums/click.
 
That's a GREAT point. The old cover band I was in had a sound engineer we often worked with who went in and applied some curve with a bunch of sharp cuts that was supposed to help with clarity and separation for IEMs, but I much prefer to have a flat signal to get a good-sounding mix because it's more fun to play when it sounds good. I don't want to JUST hear myself and drums/click.
That’s one of the biggest things I look for when I’m on in ears playing a gig/service, or if I’m doing sound for a band. I ask if my mix is flat, and ask for my guitar with zero processing. Sometimes people need to mangle a sound at FOH which doesn’t work good for the ears, or they mangle it because they don’t know what they’re doing, so I usually request my guitar to be flat.
I also send guitar to the ears or monitor because guitarists want to hear their sound, but usually everything else gets sent with some form of processing, especially drums. Usually bass too.
 
Back
Top Bottom