And quite honestly I am much more comfortable tweaking in the editor so I guess I am just out of luck. Sad day for me.
I own a Vox Ac30 and I was disappointed with FW 9 which was around the time I upgraded to Axe Fx 2.
With FW 10 is a lot more accurate to my ears
Never owned or played through a real AC30,Could I ask what settings you use on the real amp? I've found it needs more treble than before v10 and different IR mixes ,but its working well for me.
that thought isn't entirely accurate. Cliff modeled the amps to sound exactly like the amps. if anything sounds "close mic'ed" it's because of the IR being used. if you, for example, use one from Redwirez with the mic placed further away it won't be so "close mic'ed" sounding. it's all down to the IRs now which is great imho as we can trust in the amps to actually sound like the amps to start with...That's when I realized that what Cliff had done is make the Axe sound just like a close mic'd guitar cab.
The real AC 30 can be bright depending on what speakers you use. It also needs a boost if you need to get some distortion, but that also depends on what tubes you use.
For a dirty tone I set the treble at half or a bit higher, if you turn the bass to high the AC 30 can get muddy so I usually run it at 11 o'clock.
The gain about 3/4 and the master also at 3/4.
It also has a tone cut which I usually at the brightest setting. I also use a 10 band eq to smooth out the distortion by boosting 500 Hz and 1 kHz by 1 db. I use an OCD to get more gain out of it.
For cleans I just lower the gain to 1/2 or 1/4 and boost the treble a bit.
I owned various Vox amps and they all sound different depending on which model and year.
Some sound really good and some just ok.Hope this helps.
Try reducing definition and set character value to 1-2 and character frequency to lowest possible.
that thought isn't entirely accurate. Cliff modeled the amps to sound exactly like the amps. if anything sounds "close mic'ed" it's because of the IR being used. if you, for example, use one from Redwirez with the mic placed further away it won't be so "close mic'ed" sounding. it's all down to the IRs now which is great imho as we can trust in the amps to actually sound like the amps to start with...
I just compared the model to the V9 version. Four things changed:
Triode Hardness, was equivalent to 0.0.
XFRMR HF, was 15,000
XFRMR Match was higher, set this to 1.4 to replicate V9.
The level into the power amp was lower. Set the MV Trim to 0.67 to replicate this.
Now, the V10 model assumes 6V6 power tubes (tetrodes). These will be harsher than EL34s. If you want the softer breakup of EL34s set the Pwr Tube Type to Pentode. V9 power amp modeling was similar to Pentode.
If you make these changes it should sound virtually identical. If you also set the Global Modeling Version to 9.xx it WILL be identical.
I just compared the model to the V9 version. Four things changed:
Triode Hardness, was equivalent to 0.0.
XFRMR HF, was 15,000
XFRMR Match was higher, set this to 1.4 to replicate V9.
The level into the power amp was lower. Set the MV Trim to 0.67 to replicate this.
Now, the V10 model assumes 6V6 power tubes (tetrodes). These will be harsher than EL34s. If you want the softer breakup of EL34s set the Pwr Tube Type to Pentode. V9 power amp modeling was similar to Pentode.
If you make these changes it should sound virtually identical. If you also set the Global Modeling Version to 9.xx it WILL be identical.
...but Cliff also mentioned that the Wrecker was virtually unchanged from v.9. this is not the case with a lot of the other models which have been mimic'edWow I wonder if that clues us into making other amps sound like v9 for those who need it.