Being an early era Rush fan coming back to the middle era albums (Grace thru Test for Echo) many years later, I found that I had to set aside my nostalgia for the style and sound of the earlier stuff (up to MP), and appreciate, without expectation, those middle albums in a different context with keyboards prominent and a Lifeson tone / style that is quite different.
Now that I have the context, that totally makes sense. My first exposure to Rush is Moving Pictures. And I loved everything that they recorded prior to that album.
Just to be completely clear Permanent Waves was a let down (disappointment) only because I was wanting more of the large concept (both lyrically and musically) while maintaining their rawness type album much like @sprint. At that time things were changing fast with Prog and I was bumming about many bands going in more commercial directions or disbanding all together. I wasn’t completely thrilled about Yes’ 90125 at first, yet I was loyal and into albums like Tormato and Drama. I warmed up to much of the music on P-Waves and Moving Pictures and definitely most all Trevor Rabin Yes. Heck I played Free Will, Spirit of the Radio and YYZ along with La Villa Strangiato in bands and as go to songs when jamming. Well not so much La Villa, that was a song me and 3 guys perfected in a short lived band in 1981.
In all honesty I have never really cared for the post Neil’s tragedies and their long absence output like Vapor Trails, etc. I wanted to like it and as I said saw 3 shows on the VT tour because I wanted to support them as a band after learning all that had happened and what they survived. Also, the shows were entertaining. I will need to listen closer to Clockwork Angels because my brother says it’s good. I did see all the live videos released in the 2000’s through borrowing them from my brother.
I totally get where you’re coming from. Yes Drama is actually my favorite Yes album (sacrilege, I know). As I started with MP, I had no expectations with Permanent Waves and really enjoyed the songs. The Spirit of Radio was the benchmark that we used (in high school) of whether you were a good guitarist or not.
Their music post-Neil’s tragedies are harder for me to keep listening to as well because of the meandering vocals. It seemed to me like he was singing a book, not a song. I loved singing their songs before that era.
"My" Rush is Signals up until Test for Echo.
I got into them in 1991, when Tommy Vance put an hour on of one of their shows from Wembley Arena from the Roll The Bones tour.on his Friday Night Rock show on Radio1
I didn't have the history of the early stuff, and I love bands like Pink Floyd and Marillion with atmospheric and cinematic use of keyboards, so I took so the heavy keyboard era, and I really love Alex's playing on those records. Even if I don't care for a lot of his tones from that era.
They seemed to run out of hooks on Test for Echo, and I couldn't tell you the last time I listened to any of the later albums.
I made a point of seeing them a few times whenever they came to England, and when Neil's death was announced it hit me like I'd lost someone important to me - aside from being my fav drummer his lyrics meant an awful awful lot to me growing up. So, it was a rare celebratory death that actually meant something to me
What's great for me is they have all these different eras. If they did the same thing all the time I doubt they would have been as loved, but even thought their sweet spot is early 80's through to mid-90's I doubt we'll ever see a band quite like them.
It’s so cool how we all have different paths that brought us to Rush. A friend of mine got into them starting from Counterparts. He kept telling me that I would love that album but it took me a while before I gave it a try. The synth period really wrecked my interest in their music. I’m glad I listened to him as I do appreciate those later albums.