"Fellas, I'm ready to get up and do MY thang!"
oh... my... fkn... god.... lmao
the JCM800 / 1960A worked....
it's nuts... lmao...
proves my theory..
stupidity is the path to innovation..
EDIT:
Hiwatt to the left
JCM800 to the right
they chime like a bell
clarky,
So this seems like a bit of a different style for you from your previous tone-quests?!? Good on you for "mixing-it-up!" I love to play different styles too...
One thing that you and simeon seem to be correctly onto (without actually spelling it out) is that "clean" funk-guitar really isn't always "clean," if you know I mean, Gene - lol! There should be a little "grease/grit" to the tone IMHO...Also, no effects (except for maybe a little appropriate mix-environment as you/clarky alluded to) is probably a good (authentic) idea!
I think sometime in the 80's, (probably in L.A!) dance/pop-music was being produced with nods to the past
(Motown; James Brown; Isley Brothers, Earth Wind & Fire, etc.) but with
"squeaky-clean/glassy-sheen" production-values
(I.E: Michael Jackson; Madonna; Gloria Estefan; etc.) Along the way, someone
(or the producers and the scene collectively) sucked the life out of Funk! (It actually wasn't funk anymore, but since it was the closest thing
vocally & rhythmically to funk on the airwaves, that's what people assumed funk then sounded like!) FWIW, I myself was totally guilty of such a tone-deaf misconception as I had my:
EMG-loaded strat->ADA MP1->smiley-EQ->too-compressed->too-chorused->Digitech 128+ verb->S.S. Amp->etc..."Guilty-As-Charged" - LOL!
But then the more I dug back into the landmark/iconic-recordings:
(Motown; James Brown; Isley Brothers, Earth Wind & Fire, etc.) the more I realized how WRONG I (and many others in the late 80's!) were about our "funk-sounds!"
Don't get me wrong, I acknowledge that those 80's producers/musicians were probably trying to sound new/different from their predecessors....I mean there's no sense in replicating what had already been done, so I get that. However, I think that they went overboard sonically (too clean, overly chorused & compressed, too much reverb in general) as well as performance-wise (those original funk-masters performed as bands essentially "live" - whether or not they were an actual band like for example
"The Funk Brothers" of Motown)...They weren't an actual band, but they did so many sessions together (and laid 'em ALL down LIVE) that the performances had a little of that impossible to quantify "funky-swing/feel" to them...Know what I mean? Once Multi-tracking and overdubbing/punching became possible,
(approx. mid-70's-to-early-90's) producers got carried away with precision, which can sometimes be a good thing, but sometimes can also "suck the life out of" an otherwise "live-performance." More recently (say in the last 15-years approx.) the advent of Pro-Tools/DAW's and quantization/time-alignment as well as vocal/pitch-correction has added another layer of
"potential lifelessness and talent-masking" to these modern recordings...Just sayin...I thhink (lucky for all of us as fans) that
"the cream generally rises to the top!"
Best of luck clarky, and thanks to simeon and others for their insights on this "funky" subject as well!
My advice (although I'm no Al McKay or Catfish Collins - LOL!): Keep it "gritty," (NOT glassy,) avoid the modulation-based FX, respect the space/rests (IOW, Don't automatically scratch-your-balls-off...unless they're really that itchy).....and of course, "groove-your-ASS-off" baby - LOL!
Bill