fractalz
Power User
If you install a beta version of Mac O's or Windows you assume the same risk... Do it knowing you can reverse or be safe and wait
Wish I could revert the latest MacOS beta. No can do.
If you install a beta version of Mac O's or Windows you assume the same risk... Do it knowing you can reverse or be safe and wait
So I guess we can continue complaining how beta's should or shouldn't be released. Beta's are test versions to find bugs, right? or if you find a bug do what? Seems no one was permanently stuck? Personally I consider it an honor to load the beta's. All IMO.
It may be recoverable but it’s been established that it has major, major bugs which may take many by surprise if they don’t read the thread first and will be at best a major PITA. What’s the point of leaving it up? Fix it and then re-release.
It was pulled. I just wish I could enjoy the improved power amp modeling!It may be recoverable but it’s been established that it has major, major bugs which may take many by surprise if they don’t read the thread first and will be at best a major PITA. What’s the point of leaving it up? Fix it and then re-release.
I learned a number of cool startup tricks as a result of installing this update before a gig, like an idiot who should (and does) know better. Emergency update mode was cool. Keen to hold edit and see what I can fool around with!
Back in the day, you had to contact Support for a special boot chip to do an emergency boot. Just one of the many improvements in current hardware.I learned a number of cool startup tricks as a result of installing this update before a gig, like an idiot who should (and does) know better. Emergency update mode was cool. Keen to hold edit and see what I can fool around with!
You will young grasshopper.It was pulled. I just wish I could enjoy the improved power amp modeling!
And lose 2 weeks on returning to FAS for 'fooling around' with stuff that you have no business playing with.
It's been said, but beta is exactly that. DON'T try it if you rely on this device for steady behaviour (i.e. I have a gig in 2 days). Sure, it will be pretty solid, but any hint of complaint (outside of a constructive pointer), is in the realm of idiocy.
did i miss something on this feature? can you develop please?It works! You can cram 14 characters into each of the two lines.
The editor's Perform view is accessed via the "Perform" button or the Tools / Performance menu. From this view, Per-Preset Performance controls can be imported and/or exported using the "Block Library" control. Additionally, the view's "Per-Preset" and "Global" tabs allow label editing for controls already assigned to the "Perfrom-PP" and "Perform-Gbl" tabs.
did i miss something on this feature? can you develop please?
no bugs here. upgraded from fw5.09b
otherwise it seems to me that the remodeling of the new amp brings a rounder sound (cool on plexi's), also raising a bit the volume of presets.
Literally nobody in this thread is arguing that they shouldn’t be releasing betas. I merely said that at some point they should pull that particular one down, which they did. I was not and am not “complaining.” Everybody’s arguing against straw men here.
These amps go to 11!So 5.09 never became final and 5.10 never existed? Sorry I'm new to Axe Fx III but not new to software development.
Same opinion here. As per past practice, FAS pulled the beta when more serious issues were uncovered. It did stay up a bit longer than in past instances but it is the weekend so ... I did software development for 30 yrs and from what I see FAS has a well disciplined software release methodology. As always there are risks for beta users which is the price paid for getting hands on new features early - it's all good!
This thread is taking on a TGP vibe. Yikes.