Or a large number plus a clever way to do (ideally lossless or low error) compression/"interpolation" (e.g. dimensional reduction or modeling) of response vs radial and linear distance.
A new technique that prevent phase . In other words, it never sound like ****. Don’t have tried yet.
Oh wow this is a good combination on the Recto Slant 4x12 with the IIC+ (any of them) dialed in right.
She prefers distance. About a mile or so.
This is exactly what I think is happening. Small, maybe tiny, increments, so any "interpolation" that is necessary would have very little room for error.
True, but if you examine the .syx file, you can get a pretty good idea of how many IR's there are. It's far fewer than the "13 billion" in the quoted message I was replying to...that's what I meant by "relatively small"
.
Somewhere Cliff talked about the selection of the microphones, and especially the condenser, and how it made a difference. It might have been in the thread when he revealed a preview IR. That IR sounded wonderful and I replaced several other IRs in Cab blocks in several presets.
We now need a feature in cab block to add more phasing.
The align tab still works so you can add phase
Having had multiple Line 6 Helix and played with their cabs and purchased thousands of big-name IRs, I was stunned hearing the sound of the Dyna-Cabs. The interface isn't the important part, it's pretty much what would need to be in place to accomplish the microphone position selection… wiggle the cursor and move the dot in front of the speaker.
When using "Legacy" IR:s, I often use align to alter the phase in the relation between multiple mics. It actually makes the high end sound more pleasant. I guess it's no different for Dyna Cabs.
Pretty good ones, I’d say.
But it requires two IR’s to create phase problems
