slimefuzz
Inspired
I wish for the attack to be modifiable with expression, etc.Yeah, I was considering making a "Slow Gear" type based on that.
and the attack to go very fast like 1-2 ms up to 1 sec or longer.
I wish for the attack to be modifiable with expression, etc.Yeah, I was considering making a "Slow Gear" type based on that.
Appreciate that.I'm not measuring any additional gaps.
The next release will only do the slow bypass when bypassing/engaging. During channel/scene changes the bypass/engage will be normal speed. This will prevent any funkiness during channel/scene changes.
Just cause you can’t imagine it being different does not mean it isn’t . It has a negative feedback nob called response. It would be cool if the negative feedback on the amp block reacted the same as the real amp or if it was incorporated on the authentic page . It also has a depth nobI can't imagine the BE100 is that much different to warrant a completely new model?
I know they have a 5153 100w and 50w but to my understanding those amps have different voicings....especially the blue channel
Nice! Just feel like there are better things to work on but obviously others have various needs and wantsJust cause you can’t imagine it being different does not mean it isn’t . It has a negative feedback nob called response. It would be cool if the negative feedback on the amp block reacted the same as the real amp or if it was incorporated on the authentic page . It also has a depth nob
Nope no beta.
I have limited music time, so I almost always wait for real releases, instead of chasing weirdness that gets resolved for the final.
Are you booting up on an empty preset? If not, what is the cpu utilization of that preset before the update?Anyone familiar with this error message?
Updated FW and boot time is SUUUPER slow.
Tried reinstall in safe boot mode, same soup.
EDIT: Tested memory and got the all-clear. Going to reinstall previous FW for now... maybe an issue just on the Turbo?
...aaand everything's gravy with FW21.01 again. :?
View attachment 116025
Hey thereAnyone familiar with this error message?
Updated FW and boot time is SUUUPER slow.
Tried reinstall in safe boot mode, same soup.
EDIT: Tested memory and got the all-clear. Going to reinstall previous FW for now... maybe an issue just on the Turbo?
...aaand everything's gravy with FW21.01 again. :?
View attachment 116025
Pretty high, 69-71%. But that's not the kind of slow I'm talking about. I mean go grab a cup of coffee slow. Same load preset on 21.01, maybe 30sec.Are you booting up on an empty preset? If not, what is the cpu utilization of that preset before the update?
I can't imagine the BE100 is that much different to warrant a completely new model?
I know they have a 5153 100w and 50w but to my understanding those amps have different voicings....especially the blue channel
I've had the BE100 Dlx and BE50. I think you could get the BE models in the Axe to sound pretty much identical to the BE50 with just a few small tweaks to the Depth, Depth Freq and Negative Feedback controls. I understand it would be convenient to have the BE50 modeled with those exact knobs/switches on the authentic tab, but they're basically the same amp with slightly different controls for the power section (e.g. response knob vs a switch with preset levels of FB, fixed depth freq. vs a 3-way switch etc).Just cause you can’t imagine it being different does not mean it isn’t . It has a negative feedback nob called response. It would be cool if the negative feedback on the amp block reacted the same as the real amp or if it was incorporated on the authentic page . It also has a depth nob
The only channel on a Mark V that is tonally similar to earlier Mark Series heads is channel 3. I owned a Mark II C+ for over a decade along with a ton of other Mark Series Boogies over the years, and none of them do what channels 1 and 2 do on a Mark V 90 watt head does. Between the various modes found on channel 1 and 2 (clean, fat, tweed) along with selectable wattage and two types of post EQ in the form of either a graphic or the rotary controls, you've essentially got 6 different amp sounds on just the first two channels.Mark V is the same thing as a Mark IV w/ a few extra features. They sound virtually identical.
I don't think you're going to change his mind, just saying..I've had the BE100 Dlx and BE50. I think you could get the BE models in the Axe to sound pretty much identical to the BE50 with just a few small tweaks to the Depth, Depth Freq and Negative Feedback controls. I understand it would be convenient to have the BE50 modeled with those exact knobs/switches on the authentic tab, but they're basically the same amp with slightly different controls for the power section (e.g. response knob vs a switch with preset levels of FB, fixed depth freq. vs a 3-way switch etc).
I don't blame him. There's probably just as many Plexi models and I love each and every one of themI don't think you're going to change his mind, just saying..
There's 13 Friedman amp models and he's asking for another one. That's dedication.
We all have an emotional attachment or love for some type of guitar gear or another. His thang right now is Friedman, that's cool.I don't blame him. There's probably just as many Plexi models and I love each and every one of them
The thing is i do have it sounding identical . Yet I still want the be 50I've had the BE100 Dlx and BE50. I think you could get the BE models in the Axe to sound pretty much identical to the BE50 with just a few small tweaks to the Depth, Depth Freq and Negative Feedback controls. I understand it would be convenient to have the BE50 modeled with those exact knobs/switches on the authentic tab, but they're basically the same amp with slightly different controls for the power section (e.g. response knob vs a switch with preset levels of FB, fixed depth freq. vs a 3-way switch etc).
There were no changes to the pitch block.Is it me, or has the latency of the Virtual Capo increased?