It looks like on the III, you have to use a block for input and output. So really, it's almost the same as the 12 columns on the II.
^ That right there! ^You forget that on the II the first and last blocks in each row are automatically connected to inputs and outputs, so the first and last columns are of limited usefulness.
^ That right there! ^
Being able to move the inputs and outputs wherever you want them is a great option. If all of the input and output controls are in those blocks, this is a powerful upgrade, in my opinion. Especially for those using IEMs or other things they want to control independent of other outputs. I like this.
^ That right there! ^
Being able to move the inputs and outputs wherever you want them is a great option. If all of the input and output controls are in those blocks, this is a powerful upgrade, in my opinion. Especially for those using IEMs or other things they want to control independent of other outputs. I like this.
Yes. Each input block has a built-in gate and each output block has a row mixer and master level.
Meters are on a separate Layout page, independent of Zoom.Ah cool, thanks. But while zoomed in, it shows level meters instead of block names, right? Can the meters be turned off?
You forget that on the II the first and last blocks in each row are automatically connected to inputs and outputs, so the first and last columns are of limited usefulness.
Meters are on a separate Layout page, independent of Zoom.
What scenario are you picturing where this is a problem? I suspect there's a fairly simple workaround for anything you've run into before.
Well, I wouldn’t call it a problem, actually. With four inputs and four outputs I guess I’ll be covered.
I meant on the Axe-FX II. What's a scenario where the automatic connection from first/last row to input/output was an issue?
Oh, when I’m using split signal for FOH with a cab and for the stage amp without, I need the FXL as late as possible, but as a late block, it connected to output. So I had to redo everything to move it earlier. I also needed to connect to FXL from a vocal chain which had to end in a column prior to FXL to connect, which made it shorter. It also had to start later so that it didn’t connect to the input.
There are some tricks and workarounds, and I don’t remember all the details, but it’s gotten cumbersome at times.
Also, working with FXL and send/return blocks is a pain, somewhat. Especially given that there’s only one send/return pair.
When FXL is connected to output, just turn its Level down to prevent it entering Output 1.
Yes, I know that. There was some problem with it though when I did that, but I can’t recall which, as I reverted to moving it back to the earlier columns. Probably there wasn’t enough attenuation and with enough FOH gain some of that got through? Although that should have been able to be resolved with the output mixer. Don’t remember, sorry.
Anyway, even when there are workarounds, this automatic connection has been awkward, to put it mildly.
If -80 dB isn't enough you can set the FXL and output mixer row balance controls oppositely. That will remove it completely from Out 1.
That’s assuming you have mono running through Out1.
No, this just removes the FXL block output signal from Output 1. Output 1 mode isn't relevant.
Well, there you are. And in the same quote with His Fractalness. These "answer from the source" experiences are a good part of what moved me to FAS, and has kept me here since. Thanks, Cliff.Yes. Each input block has a built-in gate and each output block has a row mixer and master level.