Hi
I've been using an SLA 1 in bridged mono mode for several months now with my Ultra and have been, for the most part, quite satisfied with the tones I'm getting. I'm driving a single EVM-12L in an open backed Pearce cabinet.
For one reason or another I was tinkering today and hooked up the SLA1 in stereo mode using just Channel 1 in mono.
At similar sounding levels to the way I play it bridged, I thought it sounded just a very little bit sweeter and more musical in unbridged mode.
Hard attacks are a little bit rounder and less harsh. The highs and lows are a bit clearer.
Is it likely that I'm imagining all this? (The difference is very very subtle.)
Do ss power amps when bridged typically have different specs (besides the higher power output) from the regular published specs of the amp when used unbridged?
I.e. Higher THD etc.?
I've been using an SLA 1 in bridged mono mode for several months now with my Ultra and have been, for the most part, quite satisfied with the tones I'm getting. I'm driving a single EVM-12L in an open backed Pearce cabinet.
For one reason or another I was tinkering today and hooked up the SLA1 in stereo mode using just Channel 1 in mono.
At similar sounding levels to the way I play it bridged, I thought it sounded just a very little bit sweeter and more musical in unbridged mode.
Hard attacks are a little bit rounder and less harsh. The highs and lows are a bit clearer.
Is it likely that I'm imagining all this? (The difference is very very subtle.)
Do ss power amps when bridged typically have different specs (besides the higher power output) from the regular published specs of the amp when used unbridged?
I.e. Higher THD etc.?