PowerTube
Member
What's Bogren?Fractal is about options. Even if it gets you in trouble. It's up to you to make it sound good.
This Bogren thing sorta brings it to a head. They do the opposite and dare you to complain.
What's Bogren?Fractal is about options. Even if it gets you in trouble. It's up to you to make it sound good.
This Bogren thing sorta brings it to a head. They do the opposite and dare you to complain.
A 'one knob' plugin for modern metal.What's Bogren?
Ask Glenn FrickerWhat's Bogren?
Totally agree . I would say just a powered cab is all they need that has dedicated software in the axe that is designed to work optimally with it. This would leave the Axe hardware unaffected and all existing options unaltered. This would give us amp experience and truly the ability to share patches in a way that would mean something because they would sound like they did to to person making them instead of how they are now.Just a thought... when you get a Fractal unit, there are a bazillion different combinations where they can be employed. Different power amps, monitors, methods. For that reason, everyone is basically going to sound different. I'm sure they sound radically different across a monitor system vs a small combo vs a stack vs direct recording.
So why don't they also offer preconfigured amps? Stacks, half stacks, combos, etc... They could offer a quality combo or stack in varying levels of power and sizes.
Personally, I would be all over this. A ready-made Fractal system that behaves like a traditional amp. Not only that, but when someone creates a patch for, say, the 4x12 half stack, it would sound exactly the same on an identical stack. No further tweaking or aggravation would be needed.
Imagine this in your living room:
View attachment 103943
Crowded space. Low margins. Anything that is easy gets crowded. There are dozens of companies making monitors. Few survive for very long.
I'm not understanding what added value this proposal provides over the existing best of breed choices - ie Axfx and matrix+asc, clr ... - what's the added feature(s) that would attract customers away from other choices?.Keep in mind, in my above scenario, the unit can easily be unplugged from its attached power amp and run across the amp of your choice. Or a PA, or another guitar amp, or anything, really. Same with the speakers. So it really doesn't limit you at all; it just offers a good integral amp and a good cabinet with non-coloring speakers.
For a lot of people, it won't, especially those who already own Fractal gear and have settled on their favorite power amp and monitors. For first-time Fractal buyers who want a ready-made solution, it would be ideal. Not only that, but users who already own a Fractal rig might want something more compact.I'm not understanding what added value this proposal provides over the existing best of breed choices - ie Axfx and matrix+asc, clr ...
You'll need to add another zero to your number! Clean headroom is paramount and it has been determined long ago that 2-300 watts in a SS amp is where you want to be to have good clean non distorting volume at gig levels.For a lot of people, it won't, especially those who already own Fractal gear and have settled on their favorite power amp and monitors. For first-time Fractal buyers who want a ready-made solution, it would be ideal. Not only that, but users who already own a Fractal rig might want something more compact.
I can totally see this selling like crazy, especially if they were to offer, for example, a 30- or 40-watt combo. Remember that it can still be patched out to the amp and speakers of your preference. But if you use it live, it's one thing to carry instead of four or more in some cases.
I'm not suggesting that they stop selling their traditional products, but add this as an offering.
Some guys pay through the nose for a really great combo amp that might do a few tones really well, A grab and go FAS combo would be a great add! What's not to understand? I mean your guitar and a combo to carry, plug in and playI'm not understanding what added value this proposal provides over the existing best of breed choices - ie Axfx and matrix+asc, clr ... - what's the added feature(s) that would attract customers away from other choices?
Yeah, I could see that. I've always noticed that "tube wattage" seems a lot more potent than "solid-state wattage." My old "300 watt" Vetta head rig couldn't touch a 100-watt tube Marshall for sheer volume.You'll need to add another zero to your number! Clean headroom is paramount and it has been determined long ago that 2-300 watts in a SS amp is where you want to be to have good clean non distorting volume at gig levels.
Without a doubt tubes clip a lot more musically! FAS has always been about options and this would be yet one more to add to that long list.Yeah, I could see that. I've always noticed that "tube wattage" seems a lot more potent than "solid-state wattage." My old "300 watt" Vetta head rig couldn't touch a 100-watt tube Marshall for sheer volume.
But remember, like I mentioned above, these could still be cabled out to the power amp or PA of your choice.