I sold my CLR neo II off a year or more ago; I was using an Ax8 at the time (now run a III).
My issue was primarily with the overall sonic signature of the box. I understand that it is supposed to be a relatively "neutral" sounding speaker, but I always found the top end harsh and the bottom end lacking. Compared to the rest of my PA (Yamaha DX12s, QSC k8s, Samson SM10s and SM12s, Turbosound iQ10) it required the most EQ work to sit comfortably in the mix on stage. So even if the rest of my rig was colored and "less than perfect," the CLR was the outlier in terms of my regular setups.
Second, I just never got along with physical build. It was prone to dings and chips in the cab, and was just bulkier (though lighter) overall compared to my other gear.
Third, I ended up trying out an IEM approach for my own monitoring, moved through some of the above monitors in various configurations, and have more recently settled in on a PS170 + cab for my onstage sound (a particular setup that I couldn't run well until I upgraded to the III).
So now I view any sort of onstage monitor in same way I think about cabs in general: I want to use the coloration rather than trying to find some sort of platonic ideal.
joe