yyz67
Fractal Fanatic
I'm still not eligible in my state but debating which to get. I'm not medically or biologically educated so the decision will be mostly based on faith.
The J&J one is a traditional tried-and-true approach but has lower reported efficacy (for different conditions).
The mRNA ones are relatively new tech with higher efficacy but also with unknown long-term side-effects. They appear to hack a cell's processes directly to make spike proteins (that look like COVID proteins) which is a little unnerving -- yes, that's what viruses do as well, but these mRNA things are totally synthetic. It sounds like they are 'delicate' (need frozen temps) and harmlessly break down after doing their thing. They also aren't supposed to muck with our cellular DNA itself.
Any in the know who could shed more light, particularly the mRNA ones?
I'm asking seriously, please refrain from conspiracy theory conversation if at all possible.
The J&J one is a traditional tried-and-true approach but has lower reported efficacy (for different conditions).
The mRNA ones are relatively new tech with higher efficacy but also with unknown long-term side-effects. They appear to hack a cell's processes directly to make spike proteins (that look like COVID proteins) which is a little unnerving -- yes, that's what viruses do as well, but these mRNA things are totally synthetic. It sounds like they are 'delicate' (need frozen temps) and harmlessly break down after doing their thing. They also aren't supposed to muck with our cellular DNA itself.
Any in the know who could shed more light, particularly the mRNA ones?
I'm asking seriously, please refrain from conspiracy theory conversation if at all possible.
Last edited: