deathbyguitar
Power User
I honestly don't care what happens anymore. Some of you guys have lost of your goddamn minds.
The mk I/II are old hardware, be happy enough it's been updated this much. Why are you angry ? Do you know any other product that got so much updates ? I don'tIf I wanted an XL, I would've gotten an XL.
That said, I'm still kinda put off by the "no upgrades" thing given that support for backwards compatibility is said to be the driver for the decision. It seems rather unlike Cliff to paint himself into a corner, increasing the FW image size to the point that the Mk 1 hardware can't support it. I wouldn't go so far as to say that it's planned obsolescence but the decision not to make the compatibility modes conditional when they were implemented is a heckuva case of unplanned obsolescence.
You can still buy an XL+ now and use the MKI/II as a backupIf I wanted an XL, I would've gotten an XL
What will you do if no more firmware updates on Mark I and Mark II?
This poll will close on Oct 27, 2016 at 4:38 AM.
1. Buy a used XL or XL+
2. Buy a new XL+
3. Wait for Axe-FX III
4. Buy an AX8
5. Buy a non Fractal product
6. Keep using Mark I or Mark II no plans to change.
This reminds me I have an old DOS XT (8086 processor) computer, from the 80s, and I'm really pissed I cannot get Windows 10 to run on it. And it really pisses me off more that Microsoft had the nerve to keep writing bigger and bigger code, to create newer versions of windows. That made me have to buy bigger, more powerful, faster computers with lots more memory to run it.If I wanted an XL, I would've gotten an XL.
That said, I'm still kinda put off by the "no upgrades" thing given that support for backwards compatibility is said to be the driver for the decision. It seems rather unlike Cliff to paint himself into a corner, increasing the FW image size to the point that the Mk 1 hardware can't support it. I wouldn't go so far as to say that it's planned obsolescence but the decision not to make the compatibility modes conditional when they were implemented is a heckuva case of unplanned obsolescence.
If I wanted an XL, I would've gotten an XL.
That said, I'm still kinda put off by the "no upgrades" thing given that support for backwards compatibility is said to be the driver for the decision. It seems rather unlike Cliff to paint himself into a corner, increasing the FW image size to the point that the Mk 1 hardware can't support it. I wouldn't go so far as to say that it's planned obsolescence but the decision not to make the compatibility modes conditional when they were implemented is a heckuva case of unplanned obsolescence.
This way Mark I & II owners still get the update and can always load up a previous firmware if they like it better.
The axe-fx is so good now there is no such thing as obsolete. Honestly it sounds identical to every amp that is modeled What more do you want? I am happy now even if there is never another firmware released. Its all just a bonus now.Wow, that's just a really rude thing to say. I'm amazed what some people will infer given that they know absolutely nothing about how much work goes into a product like this. Accusing a manufacturer with a track record like ours of planned obsolescence is downright insulting.
Appears there is a simple solution to all of this... (if this hasn't been mentioned yet)
Mark I & II updates only have the current and the previous firmware version included.
XL update has the current update and all previous firmware versions.
This way Mark I & II owners still get the update and can always load up a previous firmware if they like it better.
And those that want all previous firmware versions loaded can update to an XL
Play
guitar
See posts #4, #5, and #6! Woot!