aleclee
Power User
If true, I find it exceptionally uncool for people to bag on a guy who can't defend himself.He was banned.
If true, I find it exceptionally uncool for people to bag on a guy who can't defend himself.He was banned.
I even think every internet forum can use a contributor like him to have more bias toward knowledge, facts and science vs. the all-too-common unsubstantiated personal opinion or snake oil presented as facts and science.
I won't miss him. I prefer a more SUBJECTIVE outlook.
If true, I find it exceptionally uncool for people to bag on a guy who can't defend himself.
They are (again generally) extremely details-oriented people and can drill down a subject to its lowest level. That's great. However, they sometimes (and please don't flame me because I know not ALL engineers are like this) they fail to grasp the larger picture because they drown in the details. The old expression 'tripping over dollars to pick up dimes' comes into play here. I can't count the number of times a meeting has gotten derailed by arguments over insignificant details and hurt feelings. Things get nasty quickly and people start sniping at each other.
My point is that the best organizations I have consulted or worked for understand the different skill-sets (as can mitigate the deficiencies) that each functional group brings to the table. I have found that typically the best scenario is to pair a details-minded engineer with a globally-minded moderator that can diffuse a tense situation and get the discussion back on track. And that is what I ultimately hope could happen here. Because I see a strong need for Jay's expertise here on this forum. And would strongly appreciate his return as a technical expert.
Jay was the truth cop here and his presence/future contributions will be sorely missed. He contributed to the most repected book in the audio industry and shared his knowledge freely too.
Handbook for Sound Engineers - Blackwell Bookshop Online
How many technical forums enjoy this kind of attention from people like this? What I saw was clear motivation to stop the spread of misinformation and nothing more. Errors were corrected and he left the stark facts behind for others to learn from. Some considered that rude - too bad. Who is really the jerk here - the guy that spews bullshit or the guy that cleans it up? Who's going to do that now?
Nobody likes being corrected and if Jay didn't sugar coat his response you likely didn't earn it. The way I see it, if Jay imposed potential fear to trolls and arsetalkers that's a darn good thing as it makes for a better forum overall. I rarely saw him engage with someone where he didn't first offer a benefit-of-doubt. If you failed at that and continued on with it he would take you to the cleaners. What do you expect - kid gloves from an old-schooler? If you have grown up in these times where the score isn't kept so feelings aren't hurt, you simply got some needed education.
I say thanks to Jay for his time and patience in helping those that can be helped.
If true, I find it exceptionally uncool for people to bag on a guy who can't defend himself.
Most aren't bagging him. Anyway a multiple page (and growing) thread is a pretty good indication of the man's legend. None of us is going to rate multiple pages when we leave a forum.
JWW
I can't imagine he would not be hurt personally, it's a pretty personal thing. It's not like layoffs where 20% of the users got banned and he just happened to be one of them that was paid too much. If it was me, I would certainly be personally offended. I'm neither condoning nor condemning, just saying that it's pretty much impossible to not take anything personally that you've invested so much time into.I hope he is not hurt personally by being banned.
GOOD....glad he's gone!!
He once replied to a thread I started about having sponsored artists make/share patches.. .
...it was so unsupporting and a put down my efforts. I ALMOST reported/complained about him......Jeez, if a moderator thwarts your enthusiasm!