yek
Contact Fractal for your Custom Title
So why even have channels if you're going to have 3 Amps?
2 Amp blocks x 4 channels = 8.
3 Amp blocks x 0 channels = 3.
So why even have channels if you're going to have 3 Amps?
2 Amp blocks x 4 channels = 8.
3 Amp blocks x 0 channels = 3.
Definite YES to 3 Amp Blocks.
Cab-wise, we can get by with 2, in various ways:
(a.) Use those IR-only blocks;
What is this? I can't find much on the forum using the search
2 Amp blocks x 4 channels = 8.
3 Amp blocks x 0 channels = 3.
I must have missed where this was stated as the way 3 amp block would be implemented?
The intention, I believe, is not for 3 amps simultaneously. It is for selecting between 3 amps using the multiplexor for totally seamless switching. Using the multiplexor is faster than changing the amp channel.Having three different amps for different passages of the same song (especially to faithfully duplicate a studio recording during a live gig) only by changing scenes might be useful on a song or two (Roundabout/Your Move, etc). Playing three different amps simultaneously would be unnecessary. Diminishing returns. However, having one foot controller would be awesome.
Beat that dead horse in the other threads.Well that will be great. Will still need the foot controller, right?
funny, the same idiom came to mind........the waitlist sits patiently....Beat that dead horse in the other threads.
.
or 3 amp blocks X 4 channels = 122 Amp blocks x 4 channels = 8.
3 Amp blocks x 0 channels = 3.
Has 3 amp blocks been confirmed...or is Cliff just gonna surprise us in an upcoming firmware?
Maybe not 3 but 4 that would be s surprise.[/QUOT
It’s pretty obvious. It would be a step backwards, from 8 to 3. Eh, 5 steps. That 3 amps would work for you is no valid reason to assume that it should suffice for others too.