less complaining maybe?Sounds great in theory...but hard to answer without knowing what the downside would be in terms of future resource utilization. Less obviously...but less what?
less complaining maybe?Sounds great in theory...but hard to answer without knowing what the downside would be in terms of future resource utilization. Less obviously...but less what?
The instant advantage of this for my pro clients would be that you get one for clean, one for rhythm, and one for lead without changing channels or presets. This is the ultimate power trio.
The instant advantage of this for my pro clients would be that you get one for clean, one for rhythm, and one for lead without changing channels or presets. This is the ultimate power trio.
less complaining maybe?
This is Axe Fx III - we have Channels, not X/YI currently use 2 amp blocks with X/Y switching between scenes to make use of 3 amps, and I never use more than 1amp block at a time. I doubt I would ever even touch the 3rd block. I don’t run parallel amps anymore, the single amps sound great on their own.
Would you actually use three amp blocks in a preset if there were three blocks available?
Probably not.Axe FxIII so III amps! So if the people not wanting 3 amp blocks didn't use 3, would their CPU still go up?
The instant advantage of this for my pro clients would be that you get one for clean, one for rhythm, and one for lead without changing channels or presets. This is the ultimate power trio.