rcv24
Inspired
I recently bought a Seismic Audio splitter to use at a gig so that we could run IEMs from our own mixer while still feeding a separate signal to FOH. We had to bail and go back to old school monitors because the club sound guy couldn't get a good enough signal on any of the mics. With the Seismic in the middle, he said he had the mics all cranked to the max and was still not getting a strong enough signal.
Once we took the Seismic Audio out of the mix, he was able to get the signal he expected. A buddy of mine is telling me that the Seismic Audio stuff is junk, and that I should get something like an ART S8. (@unix-guy you use the S8, right?)
I'm electronic engineering challenged, so there is a LOT I don't understand about cabling, signal, etc. However, it seems that since neither of these units are powered, I should expect the same signal loss with the ART as I would with the Seismic. Is that true? Any ideas (besides a completely defective unit) why things didn't work at the gig (e.g., cable length)? Would the ART work better?
Once we took the Seismic Audio out of the mix, he was able to get the signal he expected. A buddy of mine is telling me that the Seismic Audio stuff is junk, and that I should get something like an ART S8. (@unix-guy you use the S8, right?)
I'm electronic engineering challenged, so there is a LOT I don't understand about cabling, signal, etc. However, it seems that since neither of these units are powered, I should expect the same signal loss with the ART as I would with the Seismic. Is that true? Any ideas (besides a completely defective unit) why things didn't work at the gig (e.g., cable length)? Would the ART work better?
Last edited: