TheloniusJ
Experienced
I just wanted to share with group that I recently gave this combo a try and was pleasantly surprised. There is a separate thread on the AxeFx-III forum which you can find here: https://forum.fractalaudio.com/threads/roland-jc-120-as-a-powered-cab.172265/
Below is what I posted on that thread. Thought some might be interested in my impressions of this option.
Below is what I posted on that thread. Thought some might be interested in my impressions of this option.
I just discovered that I really dig running my FM3 into my JC-40. I had lent this out before I got my FM3 and just got it back, so thought I'd give it a try. I was very pleasantly surprised.
I ran my FM3 into the front panel inputs from the FM3 output 2. I think it sounds fantastic. The JC preamp is pretty non-coloring and accepts line level signal well (tons of headroom). I used the tone controls to tweak the tone a bit to my liking.
It doesn't sound good without the cab sim IMO, so I left a cab block in the chain.
For what it is worth, I think I get a better live representation of what I hear in my headphones (MDR-7506s) using the JC-40 than with my Headrush 108s. I know that sounds strange, but this was my initial impression. I have really found I need to use a PEQ to get what I want with the 108s, and honestly am not usually that happy with what I get.
The JC 100% gives a better live amp feel than the Headrush. It just feels better.
Lastly, running in stereo does actually come across pretty well with the JC. It obviously doesn't have the same separation as the two 108s when they are a distance apart, but it provides some nice dimensionality to the sound while keeping that tight amp punch (which tends to be lacking with the 108s).