m lebofsky
Experienced
Are the 4 LEDs that form each ring tied together, or will it be possible in the future to have them separately light up for a more granular view.
Perhaps when both tap and hold functions are assigned to a switch, the top 2 ring segments could be for tap activated and the bottom 2 could be for hold activated. If the switch hold function is not used, then all 4 segments would represent tap activated.Are the 4 LEDs that form each ring tied together, or will it be possible in the future to have them separately light up for a more granular view.
(each group of 4 just represents 1 light with 4 segments)
XX OO XX OO OX XO XO OX
XX OO OO XX OX XO OX XO
Stepping could do like this:
off 1 2 3 on
XX XO XO XO OO
XX XX XO OO OO
Definitely not going to parse that in the heat of the gigOhhh, it'd be neat if an amp/cab/effect could represent a channel too. You could get a lot of different combos, but the cognitive load might not be instantaneously recognize the states:
X = off
O = on
Code:(each group of 4 just represents 1 light with 4 segments) XX OO XX OO OX XO XO OX XX OO OO XX OX XO OX XO Stepping could do like this: off 1 2 3 on XX XO XO XO OO XX XX XO OO OO
Wonder if a "hold activated" blinking ring could be implemented?Love this idea. Perhaps others may have a better idea of how to visualize, but currently I have two delays (Delay 1 and Delay 2) assigned to an FC-6 switch. Engage/bypass of Delay 1 is the tap function and Delay 2 is the hold function. On any given song, I may use one, the other, OR both delays simultaneously. Other than "hearing", there is no way to tell if Delay 2 is active. Or is there............?
There's an ee-nuque idea....Wonder if a "hold activated" blinking ring could be implemented?