Deltones said:Scott Peterson said:Here's what I did:
- Drop the new FF IR's into your Axe-FX one at a time (appropriate preset, i.e. Marshall cab/Marshall preset); turning everything else in the preset to 'bypass'. Just amp/cab.
- Listen.
- Take notes.
- Make guess, type up a spec mix that makes sense and run the mixer, then convert it with Albert's converter.
- Drop it in the Axe-FX as above.
- Listen.
- Take notes.
- Adjust as you go.
Ah, the post I was looking for. Actually Scott, why don't you do this process by recording a pass with just the amp block in Reaper and then audition your cabs with Kefir or something similar? Wouldn't it be faster that way?
Scott Peterson said:Yes, yes it would. I am a creature of habit and my clunky old school 'long way' just works so I keep at it. I will be setting up what you are talking about though. It would speed up the entire process immensely.
Deltones said:Scott Peterson said:Yes, yes it would. I am a creature of habit and my clunky old school 'long way' just works so I keep at it. I will be setting up what you are talking about though. It would speed up the entire process immensely.
Scott, the post from you I referenced actually made me think about a question for the Reaper forum. Here's the link to the post, and check the part referencing "Parallel FX processing". You might know about it, but I did not (I'm a newbie Reaper user). I'll definitely check it out, as I downloaded Mike's utility today and want to attempt a few IR mixes with the farfield update.
http://forum.cockos.com/showthread.php?t=47752
dpeterson said:dont want to derail.... but i cant help but wonder why doesnt cliff just make better ir's for the axe? is he just leaving room for others to make a buck? is it that hard? the cabs are the obvious weak point in the axe now.
Cliff even said he's at the point of diminishing returns on modeling... spend some time on the cabs then no?
dpeterson said:dont want to derail.... but i cant help but wonder why doesnt cliff just make better ir's for the axe? is he just leaving room for others to make a buck? is it that hard? the cabs are the obvious weak point in the axe now.
Cliff even said he's at the point of diminishing returns on modeling... spend some time on the cabs then no?
dpeterson said:dont want to derail.... but i cant help but wonder why doesnt cliff just make better ir's for the axe? is he just leaving room for others to make a buck? is it that hard? the cabs are the obvious weak point in the axe now.
Cliff even said he's at the point of diminishing returns on modeling... spend some time on the cabs then no?
+1mitch236 said:I don't see the problem with the stock ir's. For a measly $50 you can get the latest, greatest ir's and continue to do so. Thank goodness Cliff was smart enough to give us 10 user slots which is really more than enough. The only ir improvement I would love to see (and from what I've read, it isn't possible) is the ability to name the user cabs. Other than that, like Scott says the real beauty of the aftermarket ir's is the ability to mix them.